Teams

Hills/Orsini - HCC Vamos

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-19vs Cheval Kings - KniermanWon 10
W#3 DoublesAni Ganesan / Hiren Bhatt vs Roy Wissel / Davis Bilardello2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-21vs HCC - ArmagostWon 21
L#2 DoublesEtienne Aduya / Brian Sarkozy vs Ani Ganesan / Elvin Vargas - (DQ)6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHiren Bhatt vs Bryant Moore6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Stern / Juan Quiroga vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-29Split 11
W#1 SinglesHiren Bhatt vs Andy Huang6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Williams / CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON vs Griff McGoldrick / Elvin Vargas - (DQ)7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-22vs Saddlebrook - BarbettaLost 01
L#1 DoublesGriff McGoldrick / Elvin Vargas - (DQ) vs Vinicius de Souza / Good Oh0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-01-15vs Riverhills - DeBrockeLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Ehrenpreis / Gavin Szoka vs Elvin Vargas - (DQ) / Griff McGoldrick5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHiren Bhatt / Grant Garlick vs Jaime Villegas / Michael Quinn3-6, 3-6
2022-01-08vs West Meadows - KarkourSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElvin Vargas - (DQ) / Juan Quiroga vs PHIMAGHAM PREMKANTH / Sriram Swaminathan4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesHiren Bhatt vs Charbel Karkour6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Hiren Bhatt
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.90
Grant Garlick
published 4
3.79
Carlos Layrisse
published 4
Alex Buric
published 4
Damian Laber
published 4
3.65
Elvin Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Charles Hayes
published 4
3.43
Javier Espinoza
published
Andres Luigi
published
Juan Quiroga
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hiren Bhatt
152W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.94
4
Grant Garlick
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Carlos Layrisse
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Alex Buric
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Damian Laber
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Elvin Vargas
127W–111L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Charles Hayes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Javier Espinoza
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
Andres Luigi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Juan Quiroga
85W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.