Teams

1-GGisler-CHTC

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-17Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJORGE GODOY GOMIS vs Kevin Le1-6, 2-6
2022-05-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesJORGE GODOY GOMIS / Quentin Guichard vs John Schmitt / Christian Taylor6-2, 7-5
2022-05-03vs 2-MNicholson-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesJORGE GODOY GOMIS vs Mike Larson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Brian Rosenthal vs Matthew Nicholson / Herman Naftel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-12Won 10
W#1 SinglesJORGE GODOY GOMIS vs Mike Larson6-2, 6-1
2022-04-05vs 3-JByrdWon 10
W#1 DoublesJORGE GODOY GOMIS / Quentin Guichard vs Christian Taylor / Ravi Tewari6-3, 6-4
2022-03-22vs 2-MNicholson-HRWon 10
W#1 SinglesJORGE GODOY GOMIS vs Herman Naftel6-3, 6-4
2022-03-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Geoff Gisler vs Robert Lightbourn / William Gray3-6, 2-6
2022-03-01vs 2-MNicholson-HRWon 10
W#1 SinglesJORGE GODOY GOMIS vs Herman Naftel6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Andres Carro
published 5
4.80
Julien de la Mettrie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.79
Geoff Gisler
published 5
4.75
JORGE GODOY GOMIS
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.46
Paul Wachter
published
4.24
William Calhoun
published
4.00
Ibardo Zambrano
published 4
Michael Grimmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andres Carro + Julien de la Mettrie8265% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andres Carro
90W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
4.86
5
Julien de la Mettrie
77W–20L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.80
5
Geoff Gisler
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.79
5
JORGE GODOY GOMIS
22W–16L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.75
Paul Wachter
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
4.46
William Calhoun
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
4
Ibardo Zambrano
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
Michael Grimmer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.