Teams

KY/OWB/HULSE

ADULT 18 & OVER · 4.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.20 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-01vs KY/PAD/AMUNDSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesAna Maria Vega / Shannon Hulse vs Kayla Davis / Kara Amundson6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJennifer Settle vs Soojin Kim7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAimee Ackermann / Karen Mueller vs Claire Schroering / Mindy Terrell7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-01vs KY/PAD/AMUNDSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Settle / Shannon Hulse vs Kayla Davis / Kara Amundson7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Null vs Molly Null1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAna Maria Vega vs Soojin Kim6-4, 6-4
2024-05-16vs KY/PAD/AMUNDSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesBlair Brockman / Emily Mathis vs Lori Rogers / Kara Amundson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAimee Ackermann / Karen Mueller vs Claire Schroering / Jennifer Reeder6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBarbara Kough vs Patricia Taylor7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/PAD/AMUNDSON301141090
2KY/OWB/HULSE0341123177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Aimee Ackermann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Ana Maria Vega
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Karen Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Kough
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Blair Brockman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Emily Mathis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jennifer Settle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Null
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Shannon Hulse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Gray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Ackermann + Karen Mueller5751% games−4.0% vs expected
Blair Brockman + Emily Mathis4252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aimee Ackermann
22W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Ana Maria Vega
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Karen Mueller
56W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Barbara Kough
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Blair Brockman
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Emily Mathis
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Settle
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Null
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Shannon Hulse
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Gray
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.