Teams

KY/LEX/Hays-Martin

2022 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over SOUTHERN COMBO DOUBLES LEXINGTO · 7.5 ADULT WOMEN

19 players · average NTRP 3.40 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Katie Parrish
published
3.64
3.60
Mary Cole
published
3.60
Julia Stevens
published
3.54
Kathryn Whiteman
published
3.47
Tammy Mitchell
published
3.33
Teela Watts
published
3.27
Nancy Bailey
published
Akemi Meaney
published 3.5
Amy Luchsinger
published 3.5
Dorothy Meng
published 3.5
3.14
Lola Baker
published
3.08
Martha Martin
published
2.68
Diana Simpson
published 3
Mary Ringle
published
Nancy Frederick
published
Sandra Watts-Ryan
published
Tami Neal
published
Vivian Esteve
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Montgomery + Nancy Bailey3548% games+1.9% vs expected
Tammy Mitchell + Mary Cole91053% games+1.7% vs expected
Martha Martin + Tammy Mitchell044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ringle + Dorothy Meng033 matchesnot enough data
Martha Martin + Teela Watts213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Parrish
56W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
3.5
Elizabeth Montgomery
41W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.64
Mary Cole
25W–27L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Julia Stevens
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Kathryn Whiteman
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Tammy Mitchell
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
Teela Watts
33W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Nancy Bailey
39W–36L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Akemi Meaney
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Luchsinger
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dorothy Meng
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lola Baker
10W–30L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.14
Martha Martin
16W–26L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Diana Simpson
6W–31L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Mary Ringle
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Frederick
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Watts-Ryan
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tami Neal
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vivian Esteve
14W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.