Teams

Kontoulas (Day) (SJ)

2023 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Bobeck / Ange Urlaub vs Gail Grotsky / Anne Dobson3-6, 4-6
2023-04-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Toomey / Ange Urlaub vs Cynthia Hamrick / Waldtraud Yedziniak1-6, 4-6
2023-04-06vs Lemmons/Mushett (Day)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnge Urlaub / Karen Kontoulas vs Carolyn Kingman / Uschi Raboese3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-01vs Coco/Messier (DAY)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnge Urlaub / Cathy Murawski vs Kathleen Kunze / Laura Gangeme1-6, 4-6
2023-03-22vs Davidson (55)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Toomey / Ange Urlaub vs Lynda Anderson / Denise Albrecht5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2023-03-17vs Travagliante/Thomas/DayLost 01
L#1 DoublesConnie Wilson / Ange Urlaub vs Joan Proctor / Karen Wall1-6, 5-7
2023-03-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesConnie Wilson / Ange Urlaub vs Debra Datesman / Stacey Johnson6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Lois Randall
published
3.35
Ann Schuelke
published 3.5
3.31
Lisa Toomey
published
Bett Lewis
published 3.5
3.16
Lynn Dallachie
published
3.05
Sandy Cissel
published
2.87
Ange Urlaub
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3
Cathy Murawski
published 3
2.68
Kimberly Sheahan
published
2.51
Karen Kontoulas
published
Laura Kogler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Cissel + Lois Randall134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lois Randall
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Ann Schuelke
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Lisa Toomey
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Bett Lewis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Dallachie
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Sandy Cissel
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Ange Urlaub
128W–106L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Cathy Murawski
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Sheahan
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.68
Karen Kontoulas
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
Laura Kogler
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.