Teams

CTHS MICHAEL

2025 FW USTA Adult Fall - Men N · A

13 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-09vs MCL TRANLost 13
L#1 DoublesWesley Kidd / Nathan Wester vs Scott Howell / John Herr6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWesley Pryor vs Matt Childers6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJosh Michael / Blake Dickenson vs Roger Pham / Ladarius Hicks6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAdrian Lopez / Marcelo Elgueta vs Son Tran / Nikolas Chow4-6, 5-7
2024-10-26vs SOAKS LAPENNA/GORMANLost 12
W#1 DoublesJosh Michael / Nathan Wester vs David Luningham / Lionel Girolet6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarcelo Elgueta / Caleb Gentry vs Marcus Kerr / Chris Gorman1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJordan Michael / Blake Dickenson vs Vincent Lapenna / Timothy Mangus6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-19vs RTC RAITWon 30
W#1 DoublesWesley Kidd / Josh Jones vs Stefan Luger / Dale Rait6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBlake Dickenson / Connor Mason vs Peter Avalos / Kent Collins6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarcelo Elgueta / Cody Hibbard vs Jason Dyer / Jeff Fikar6-2, 7-6
2024-10-05vs BIR HLUCHANSplit 22
L#1 DoublesWesley Kidd / Caleb Gentry vs Andy Alexander / Brandon Becicka4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWesley Pryor vs Randall White2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNathan Wester / Josh Jones vs Daniel Beres / Brian Booth6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAdrian Lopez / Tony Le vs Braxton Neiman / Andrew Itgen6-4, 7-5
2024-09-28vs HTC DUNCANSplit 22
W#1 DoublesWesley Kidd / Blake Dickenson vs Cameron Crim / Collin Strunk6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNathan Wester vs Matthew Nisson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Michael / Adrian Lopez vs Shane Allred / Hector Galarza5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJosh Michael / Marcelo Elgueta vs Jim Schick / Franklin Friday6-3, 6-1
2024-09-21vs RTC MYERSWon 21
W#1 DoublesBlake Dickenson / Adrian Lopez vs Prashanth Gourineni / Mel Shepherd7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNathan Wester vs Laxman Babu Pragadareddi2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWesley Pryor / James Monroe vs Matthew Levesque / Mike Myers6-1, 6-3
2024-09-14vs HS TRIVITTLost 13
L#1 DoublesCaleb Gentry / Trent Smith vs Steve Todd / Austin Todd2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesWesley Pryor vs Raul Buendia2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesConnor Mason / James Monroe vs Brent Giesler / Brady Giesler1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBlake Dickenson / Jordan Michael vs Brian Redding / Roy Joseph7-6, 6-3
2024-09-07vs TCU EDWARDSSplit 22
W#1 DoublesWesley Kidd / Kyle Apperson vs Conner Everett / Michael Everett7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNathan Wester vs STEFANO BONELLI6-4, 4-1
L#2 DoublesJordan Michael / Wesley Pryor vs Rodrigo Camargo de Almeida / Robert Stegner1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Michael / Adrian Lopez vs Rafael Velez / Scott Christianson2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Nathan Wester
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.24
Connor Mason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Blake Dickenson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Cody Hibbard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Wesley Kidd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Wesley Pryor
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.14
Josh Michael
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.76
Marcelo Elgueta
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Jordan Michael
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Tony Le
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Caleb Gentry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Kyle Apperson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Trent Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcelo Elgueta + Caleb Gentry3251% gamesnot enough data
Wesley Pryor + Wesley Kidd303 matchesnot enough data
Connor Mason + Blake Dickenson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathan Wester
7W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Connor Mason
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Blake Dickenson
7W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Cody Hibbard
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
Wesley Kidd
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
Wesley Pryor
20W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
Josh Michael
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
4.14
Marcelo Elgueta
21W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
Jordan Michael
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.70
Tony Le
19W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Caleb Gentry
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Kyle Apperson
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Trent Smith
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.