Teams

PLEASANTON 18AW4.0A

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · Women's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Holli Strain
published 4.5
3.96
Jennie Kessinger
published
3.96
Julianne Gee
published
3.91
Pascale Siu
published
3.88
Puja Mukherjee
published
3.85
Kathryn Aguilar
published
3.77
Shin Koo
published
3.74
Debbie Soleta
published 4
3.71
Shawn Copenhagen
published
3.71
Sharleen Houston
published
3.69
Annette Ellgaard
published 4
3.60
Erika Garell
published 4
3.57
Nicole Radlow
published
3.50
Ning Docena
published
3.43
Jennifer Leebove
published
3.34
Nicole Cring
published
Stacey Huang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Radlow + Erika Garell1441% games−2.6% vs expected
Holli Strain + Shawn Copenhagen123 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Aguilar + Puja Mukherjee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Holli Strain
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.31
Jennie Kessinger
5W–11L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.96
Julianne Gee
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
3.96
Pascale Siu
6W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.91
Puja Mukherjee
13W–17L career · no lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
3.88
Kathryn Aguilar
12W–18L career · no lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
3.85
Shin Koo
4W–13L career · no lines in 2021
96%4%<1%
3.77
4
Debbie Soleta
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Shawn Copenhagen
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
Sharleen Houston
13W–13L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Annette Ellgaard
13W–17L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Erika Garell
9W–15L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
Nicole Radlow
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
Ning Docena
13W–26L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.50
Jennifer Leebove
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
3.43
Nicole Cring
2W–16L career · no lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
3.34
Stacey Huang
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.