Teams

CAC/SL-Orange Crush-McPherson

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.92 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-05-29vs SC-SteinerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSelena Hernandez / Kathy Dinwiddie vs Marian Menke / Shirlee Steiner7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-28vs SC-SteinerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheryl Jeffries / Selena Hernandez vs Cindy Fenick / Voni Tombari2-6, 2-6
2020-10-24vs MC-SchrockLost 12
W#1 DoublesKim Morrison / Lee Darrow vs Jessica Price / Yoon Joo Han1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSelena Hernandez / Charlotte Carey vs Diane Lee / Yvonne Klopfenstein6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdawna Windom / Kathy McPherson vs Debbie Schrock / Becky Martin3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesGail Case / Colleen Tracy vs Debra Beauchamp / Arianna Whitman6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSandy Rauen / Kim Morrison vs Susanna Wilken / Jane Saddler2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLee Darrow / Kathy McPherson vs Alison Aleinikoff / Martha Tucker1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2020-10-03vs TCSP-SmithWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Morrison / Sandy Rauen vs Cheryl Smith / Carol Geballe6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Carey / Selena Hernandez vs Melanie Stubb / Susan Casabona6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLee Aalund / Stacy Bishop Lawrence vs Nancy Danoff / Maria Larionoff6-2, 6-1
2020-09-26vs ETC-Double The Fun-OtterholtWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandy Rauen / Lee Darrow vs Ginny Larsen / Margaret Bolan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLee Aalund / Stacy Bishop Lawrence vs Carrie Toppano / Donna Rigas5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Carey / Adawna Windom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-09-19vs BETC-IwasakiWon 21
W#1 DoublesGail Case / Kathy McPherson vs Jill Wakefield / Barbara Selemon6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAdawna Windom / Charlotte Carey vs Juliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLee Aalund / Stacy Bishop Lawrence vs Carolyn Cruzat / Dana Reeves6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2020-09-13vs BC-HancockWon 21
W#1 DoublesColleen Tracy / Sandy Rauen vs Jill Hancock / Suzan Chavez6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Carey / Lee Darrow vs Valerie Berberoglu / Joy Page6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdawna Windom / Selena Hernandez vs Jackie Wilkinson / Anne Bratton1-6, 3-6
2020-09-05vs CP-La CavaWon 21
L#1 DoublesKim Morrison / Gail Case vs Elaine Loong / Lili Chang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy McPherson / Lee Darrow vs Linda la Cava / Lynda Carlson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandy Rauen / Selena Hernandez vs Janice Malos / Kaylee Nilan7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lower Woodland-Tenn-Acious-Whitman6118314135
2TCSP-55% Stuart6115616162
3HBSQ-Sea-gals-Swingle6114716155
4CAC/SL-Orange Crush-McPherson6115619163
5RBW-Net Worth Doubles-Williams5212921192
6AYTC (OUTDOORS) Team Golden-Berlin4312921175
7BETC-Iwasaki4391227212
8CP-La Cava3413821175
9CP-Baird25101123204
10MC-Schrock2581326187
11EDG-55+ and Fabulous Ladies-Pine2571429217
12BC-Blazers-Currey1671429228
13ETC-Double The Fun-Otterholt0721939245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Colleen Tracy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Kim Morrison
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.77
Lee Darrow
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Gail Case
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.52
Kathy McPherson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.29
Adawna Windom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Charlotte Carey
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 0
Sandy Rauen
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Selena Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stacy Bishop Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Morrison + Lee Darrow8452% games+9.0% vs expected
Kathy McPherson + Lee Darrow6251% games+4.9% vs expected
Gail Case + Colleen Tracy2447% games−0.1% vs expected
Sandy Rauen + Kim Morrison6850% games−0.8% vs expected
Kathy McPherson + Kim Morrison2446% gamesnot enough data
Gail Case + Lee Darrow314 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Rauen + Lee Darrow134 matchesnot enough data
Kathy McPherson + Sandy Rauen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Colleen Tracy
172W–106L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Kim Morrison
64W–67L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Lee Darrow
97W–103L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Gail Case
29W–32L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Kathy McPherson
49W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Adawna Windom
12W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%94%6%
2.29
0
Charlotte Carey
32W–45L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Sandy Rauen
37W–28L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Selena Hernandez
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacy Bishop Lawrence
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.