Teams

SVB - VandeBerg

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-19vs Hunters Green Chromium - WarrenWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Duncan / Mark Frost vs Kirk Davis / KEVIN JOHNSON6-1, 6-4
2022-03-05vs Tampa Yacht Rock - B. RockwoodLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Medina / Brian Duncan vs Chris Brandriff / James Baker2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Shields / Joshua Gaufman vs Quincy Bird / Charles Mulfinger2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-26vs Buckhorn Fiery Gizzards - HarrisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Medina / Daniel Shields vs Jack Korta / Rob Harris2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTodd Vandeberg / Brian Duncan vs Chad Albertson / John Figlewski6-3, 6-3
2022-02-19vs HI Green Rush Machine - RussianLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Duncan / ROMAN SOBOLEV vs Tilford Yates / Nick Swantko7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-02-12vs Cheval 8 Horseman - HayesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Shields / David Medina vs Kyle Staggs / John Jackson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Duncan / Charlie Shell vs Louis Hanna / Matthew Hayes1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-05vs Hills/Gibson - HCC Average JoesLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Duncan / Joshua Gaufman vs Emilio Silva / Fabricio Freire3-6, 0-6
2022-01-22vs Fishhawk - O. CantuLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Duncan / Charlie Shell vs Omar Cantu / Jaime del Rio Sanchez3-6, 4-6
2022-01-15vs HCC Elite - PalmerLost 01
L#1 DoublesROMAN SOBOLEV / Daniel Shields vs Ken Chin / Michael Gauthier6-7, 6-7
2022-01-08vs Northdale - AnkneySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Medina / Daniel Shields vs Kevin Brick / John Kelly1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Duncan / Charlie Shell vs Terry Lamphier / Eric Mauritson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Joey Campbell
published
3.37
Daniel Shields
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Brian Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Todd Vandeberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Shields + Brian Duncan4355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joey Campbell
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
3.5
Daniel Shields
32W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Brian Duncan
42W–42L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Vandeberg
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.