Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-22vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW3.5DWon 21
L#1 SinglesNelly Eunhee Park vs Robyn Baumstein3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatrina Heiles / Sonia Whitfield vs Svetlana Tounkel / Yveline Coulond6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCorrine Fabie / Lise Fox vs Melissa Vuckovich / Debby Heicklen7-5, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Sonia Whitfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Jennifer Falk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Gail Fong
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.33
Katherine Sandell
published
3.27
Michelle Blake
published
3.25
Deena Elfar
published 3.5
3.23
Susan Onffroy
published
3.23
Jin Zhang
published
3.22
Lauren Roseman
published
3.16
Cynthia James
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Amy Clifford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Nelly Eunhee Park
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.11
Vera Parengkuan
published
3.10
Patrizia Fazeli
published
3.10
Erna Nishime
published 3.5
2.96
Corrine Fabie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Katrina Heiles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lise Fox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deena Elfar + Susan Onffroy3253% games+1.0% vs expected
Gail Fong + Susan Onffroy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonia Whitfield
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jennifer Falk
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Gail Fong
100W–56L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
Katherine Sandell
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Michelle Blake
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Deena Elfar
19W–34L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Susan Onffroy
23W–27L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Jin Zhang
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Lauren Roseman
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cynthia James
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Amy Clifford
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Nelly Eunhee Park
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
Vera Parengkuan
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Patrizia Fazeli
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Erna Nishime
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Corrine Fabie
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.96
Katrina Heiles
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lise Fox
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.