Teams

SGV Chic Netsetters - Yamamoto-WN/SU8

2021 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-10-31Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSandy Weyant / Jenniffer Wong vs Lisa Szeto / Henrieta Palermo0-6, 2-6
2021-10-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJenniffer Wong / Karla Garcia vs Stacy Hanway / Teresa Huang0-6, 0-6
2021-09-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Nicole Finke / Hatty Yip vs Jina Lee / Ying Li0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Lauren Nicole Finke
published
4.13
Hatty Yip
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Alicia Villarino
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Karla Garcia
published
3.63
Yolanda Barocio
published 4
3.50
Bu Kum Kim
published 3.5
3.48
Lisa Lerg
published
3.40
Laurie Manley
published
3.40
Maryann Yamamoto
published
3.34
Jenniffer Wong
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Sabrina Wedge
published
3.13
Regina Gov
published
Sandy Weyant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenniffer Wong + Yolanda Barocio1442% gamesnot enough data
Jenniffer Wong + Bu Kum Kim4166% gamesnot enough data
Jenniffer Wong + Alicia Villarino303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Nicole Finke
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
4.50
4
Hatty Yip
99W–33L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%16%84%
4.13
4
Alicia Villarino
65W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.85
Karla Garcia
2W–18L career · no lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
3.80
4
Yolanda Barocio
136W–211L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Bu Kum Kim
122W–40L career · no lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
Lisa Lerg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
Laurie Manley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
3.40
Maryann Yamamoto
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Jenniffer Wong
200W–169L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
Sabrina Wedge
2W–15L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
Regina Gov
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
Sandy Weyant
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.