Teams

Bechtold/CCC/Foothills

2025 Foothills Spring 18 & Over League · Women 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-30vs Cashion/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Blair Scheepers0-6, 0-6
2025-04-16vs Harline/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Meredith Gladden4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-09vs Voglewede-Fisher/DV/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTammy Brindle / Laura Lever vs Phoenix Fisher / Erin Riordan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Bechtold / Lori Wilson vs Ro Babcock / Renner Murphy1-6, 3-6
2025-04-08vs Cashion/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Jamey Cost6-1, 6-2
2025-03-26vs Harline/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Helen Durrant2-6, 2-6
2025-03-19vs Voglewede-Fisher/DV/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Lever / Beth Bechtold vs Erin Riordan / Katelyn Voglewede3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLori Wilson / Lori Sadowski vs Kyndy Boyle / Amy Douglas1-6, 3-6
2025-03-12vs Cashion/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Jessica Gibney6-3, 6-4
2025-03-08Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Anna Shamsnia2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Beth Bechtold
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.43
Carolyn Carlile
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Laura Lever
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.98
Tammy Brindle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.97
Lori Sadowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Kastelic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Lever + Beth Bechtold5169% games+15.9% vs expected
Laura Lever + Tammy Brindle3251% games−2.9% vs expected
Laura Lever + Lori Sadowski0630% games−13.6% vs expected
Tammy Brindle + Lori Sadowski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beth Bechtold
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Carolyn Carlile
50W–81L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.43
Laura Lever
14W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Tammy Brindle
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Lori Sadowski
1W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Kelly Kastelic
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.