Teams

MC GREEN

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-19vs LTC-M PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesAdam Kemp / Jules Perryman vs Kevin Klepacki / Seon Y Shin1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Gruszecki vs Tyler McFarland3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrendan Soane / Ruban Durai vs Dmitry Vygodner / Jacob Mueller2-6, 3-6
2026-08-05vs NJ ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesBrett Gedvilas / Adam Kemp vs Michael Reisbeck / Yah Pisutpongpan3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Gruszecki vs Thomas Cauchi6-7, 2-6
2026-07-29vs LTC-M PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdam Kemp / Brett Gedvilas vs Dmitry Vygodner / Seon Y Shin6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBrendan Soane vs Colin John6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Gruszecki / Jules Perryman vs Benoit Cauwe / Tyler McFarland5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Brendan Soane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.74
Brett Gedvilas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Paul Gruszecki
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Adam Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.24
Jules Perryman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Ruban Durai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Bernhardt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Kemp + Brett Gedvilas4946% games+7.6% vs expected
Paul Gruszecki + Jules Perryman5351% games+3.7% vs expected
Brett Gedvilas + Jules Perryman2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brendan Soane
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Brett Gedvilas
27W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Paul Gruszecki
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Adam Kemp
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Jules Perryman
12W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Ruban Durai
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Bernhardt
23W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.