Teams

Pace, Phillip

2025 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Men 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-22vs Peacock, KenWon 30
W#1 DoublesReuben Harvey / Louis Saddler vs Jeff Hollingshead / Randy Calvert6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlexandre Silva / Michael Barnard vs Richard Ross / Chris Berry7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPhillip Pace / Kevin Dotson vs Denny Williams / Donald Dukes6-1, 6-1
2025-08-11vs Peacock, KenWon 30
W#1 DoublesVladimir Abril / Alexandre Silva vs Jeff Hollingshead / Denny Williams6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesReuben Harvey / Louis Saddler vs Randy Calvert / Jeff Zachary6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Welch / Michael Barnard vs Richard Ross / Chris Berry6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Bryton Hixson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.31
Brad Ishee
published 3.5
3.23
Stan Fisher
published
3.19
Kevin Dotson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Louis Saddler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Stanley Jenkins
published
3.07
Sourav Dutta
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Reuben Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Abram Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Alexandre Silva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Phillip Pace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Andrew Welch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Michael Barnard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Vladimir Abril
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phillip Pace + Stanley Jenkins4250% games+6.0% vs expected
Reuben Harvey + Stanley Jenkins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryton Hixson
21W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Brad Ishee
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Stan Fisher
32W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Kevin Dotson
44W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Louis Saddler
31W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Stanley Jenkins
36W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Sourav Dutta
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Reuben Harvey
18W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Abram Diaz
29W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3.5
Alexandre Silva
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Phillip Pace
40W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3.5
Andrew Welch
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Michael Barnard
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Vladimir Abril
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.