Teams

Harpers Gold

2023 OH OV SUMMER A40&O 4.5M Cincinnati · 2023 Summer A40&O 4.5M Cincinnati

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-22vs Harpers SilverWon 31
W#1 DoublesJay Woffington / Nicholas Herzog vs Steven Moore / Mark Sutton6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRonnen Isakov vs Bradley Tash1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKenneth Burns / John van Lokeren vs Akash Aggarwal / Clement Tsao6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMario Contardi / Adam Moler vs Daniel Starczynowski / Michael Curnayn6-4, 3-6, 6-4
2023-07-18vs Harpers SilverWon 21
L#1 SinglesEric MacLin vs Bradley Tash2-6, 2-4
W#2 DoublesJay Woffington / Nicholas Herzog vs Oluwokay Johns / Akash Aggarwal6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrian Kuhn / Chris Dawson vs Mark Sutton / Daniel Starczynowski6-3, 6-1
2023-07-06vs Harpers SilverWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatt Poulos / John van Lokeren vs Bradley Tash / Oluwokay Johns6-0, 7-6
L#1 SinglesEric MacLin vs Daniel Starczynowski4-6, 6-3, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Kuhn / Adam Moler vs Michael Curnayn / Clement Tsao6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristopher Brock / Kendall Lemley vs Mark Sutton / Steven Moore6-4, 6-3
2023-06-28vs Harpers SilverWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Dawson / Brian Kuhn vs Oluwokay Johns / Steven Moore6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRonnen Isakov / Kendall Lemley vs Mark Sutton / Clement Tsao7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristopher Brock / Mario Contardi vs Akash Aggarwal / Daniel Starczynowski6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 Summer A40&O 4.5M Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Matt Poulos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Adam Moler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Brian Kuhn
published 4.5
Chris Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Christopher Brock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
John van Lokeren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
Ronnen Isakov
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.09
Eric MacLin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Jay Woffington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kendall Lemley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kenneth Burns
published
Mario Contardi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nicholas Herzog
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Burns + Eric MacLin3252% gamesnot enough data
John van Lokeren + Ronnen Isakov123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Poulos
21W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.66
4.5
Adam Moler
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Brian Kuhn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Chris Dawson
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Brock
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
John van Lokeren
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
Ronnen Isakov
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Eric MacLin
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
4.09
Jay Woffington
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kendall Lemley
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Burns
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mario Contardi
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicholas Herzog
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.