Teams

DAC/Kendall W3.0

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Melissa McKee
published
3.23
Jacy Russell
published 3.5
3.18
Alix Sibley
published 3
3.12
Liz Irons
published
3.11
Kristin Shackelford
published
3.06
Mary Hope Burns
published
3.00
Garland Askins
published 3
2.96
Amy Marable
published 3
2.93
Veronica Erickson
published
2.91
Jenny Dunn
published
2.83
Glenda Fodge
published 3
2.54
Kristi Kendall
published
2.48
Joli Shaw
published
2.44
2.32
Connie Baird
published 2.5
Johanna Anderson
published
Kristie Ince
published
Maggie Carlisle
published
Sara de Los Reyes
published
Sarah Cedillo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Erickson + Kristin Shackelford5165% games+10.1% vs expected
Jacy Russell + Alix Sibley4251% games−2.7% vs expected
Glenda Fodge + Kristin Shackelford6071% gamesnot enough data
Joli Shaw + Kristi Kendall2342% gamesnot enough data
Amy Marable + Alix Sibley314 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Erickson + Liz Irons314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa McKee + Alix Sibley314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Hope Burns + Veronica Erickson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa McKee
27W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Jacy Russell
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Alix Sibley
30W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.18
Liz Irons
21W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.12
Kristin Shackelford
36W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.11
Mary Hope Burns
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Garland Askins
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Amy Marable
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
Veronica Erickson
30W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
Jenny Dunn
15W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Glenda Fodge
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
Kristi Kendall
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.54
Joli Shaw
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Adrienne Saunders
9W–17L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
2.5
Connie Baird
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.32
Johanna Anderson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristie Ince
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maggie Carlisle
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara de Los Reyes
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Cedillo
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.