Teams

Alachua/Lancaster/6.0Mixed55&Over

2025 Alachua Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 55 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-28vs JTC ZerbeWon 20
W#2 DoublesPatricia Woolley / Robert Tangeman vs Melinda Hartline / Brian Kim7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRachael Seidler / Gary Orr vs Margaret Zerbe / Yoonsuk Park7-5, 6-2
2025-06-25vs JTC ZerbeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPatricia Woolley / Philip Lancaster vs Helen Ingmarsson / Attila Bodo6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRachael Seidler / John Abbitt vs Colleen Anderson / William Landis2-6, 3-6
2025-05-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRachael Seidler / Philip Lancaster vs Michelle Burns / Brian Kim6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-21vs JTC ZerbeWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa King / Robert Tangeman vs Silvia Menendez / John Stewart6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRachael Seidler / Philip Lancaster vs Brian Kim / Julie Skoby6-3, 6-4
2025-05-20vs JTC ZerbeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Tangeman / Patricia Woolley vs Colleen Anderson / Jeff Fox6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSriyani Dissanayake / Philip Lancaster vs Brian Kim / Melinda Hartline4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-04-17vs JTC ZerbeSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSriyani Dissanayake / Philip Lancaster vs Melinda Hartline / Brian Kim4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRachael Seidler / Gary Orr vs Margaret Zerbe / Attila Bodo6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Robert Tangeman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.81
Rachael Seidler
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Gary Orr
published 3
2.79
Raksha Ramkissoon
published
2.68
Patricia Woolley
published
2.67
Sriyani Dissanayake
published
2.57
Philip Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
John Abbitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Lancaster + Rachael Seidler7549% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Woolley + Gary Orr314 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Woolley + John Abbitt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robert Tangeman
146W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Rachael Seidler
77W–124L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Gary Orr
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Raksha Ramkissoon
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Patricia Woolley
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Sriyani Dissanayake
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.67
3
Philip Lancaster
90W–227L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
John Abbitt
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.