Teams

Richardson - RS Clay

2026 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-27vs Ehlers - SHLLost 02
L#1 DoublesTucker Massey / Jennifer Guthrie vs Brian Jordan / Abigail Nelson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFrederic Letourneau / Jacquelyn Stitt vs Kyle Ehlers / Kinsey Fields6-7, 0-6
2026-08-05vs Ehlers - SHLLost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Gore / Jacquelyn Stitt vs Lubomir Kaderjak / Abigail Nelson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Alex Anderson vs Stephen Baes / Ella Thompson2-6, 1-6
2026-07-29vs Ehlers - SHLLost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Gore / Sam Richardson vs William Neuner / Kateleigh Calloway3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFrederic Letourneau / Jacquelyn Stitt vs Kyle Ehlers / Kinsey Fields0-6, 6-7
2026-07-29vs Ehlers - SHLSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJosh Sitton / Alexia Rycroft vs Brian Jordan / Sunny Taylor4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFrederic Letourneau / Jennifer Guthrie vs Kyle Ehlers / Abigail Nelson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Thomas Gore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Alexia Rycroft
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Michael Richardson Jr
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.97
Sam Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.96
Josh Sitton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Frederic Letourneau
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.90
Anthony Bonjorno
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Jennifer Guthrie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Robert Fabbro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.66
Tucker Massey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Jacquelyn Stitt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Richardson + Michael Richardson Jr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Gore
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Alexia Rycroft
28W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Michael Richardson Jr
5W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
Sam Richardson
5W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
Josh Sitton
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
Frederic Letourneau
15W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.90
4.5
Anthony Bonjorno
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.90
Jennifer Guthrie
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.83
Robert Fabbro
143W–78L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Tucker Massey
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Jacquelyn Stitt
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.