Teams

Steed/Thompson/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-22vs Thomas/Blevins/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Beall / Christina Beattie vs Melissa Goldberg / Clair Bartholomew1-6, 1-6
2025-07-21vs Anderson/NashvilleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLele Thompson / Chelsea Rice vs Courtney Hendry-Williams / Laura Aylward0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesVictoria Marcella / Kacey Passmore vs Louisa Bateman / Jessica Osullivan6-0, 6-3
2025-07-14vs Ossman/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristina Beattie / Tonia Porter vs Alana Mccormack / Ann Marie Dixon0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllie Steed / Suzanne Spalding vs Mary Freeman / Thalia Kahl5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKacey Passmore / Katelyn Thorne vs Ahra Kim / Mitsuyo Suzuki6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-13vs George/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesTonia Porter / Sandra Elliott vs Celia Turner / Kristen Morrison2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatelyn Thorne / Victoria Marcella vs Kate Elasy / Lauren Pollard0-6, 2-6
2025-07-10vs Armor/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandy Kennedy / Clair Bartholomew vs Mary Elizabeth Armor / Jane Decker6-0, 6-0
2025-06-30vs Thomas/Blevins/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Elliott / Suzanne Spalding vs Rachel Fogarty / Mollie Alvarez2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesClair Bartholomew / Lele Thompson vs Brandy Kennedy / Mary Mouser6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarey Burch / Allie Steed vs Ashwini Kashelikar / Stephanie Hill4-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs Kumar/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Spalding / Jenna Hazlewood vs Scotty Falk / Barbee Morgan1-3
L#2 DoublesChristina Beattie / Eleanor Bartholomew vs Nina Kumar / Lauren Wideman6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarey Burch / Katelyn Thorne vs Elisa Hill / Rebekah Carroll2-6, 1-6
2025-06-12vs Lindsay/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Kennedy / Allie Steed vs Patricia Frawley / Melissa Goldberg3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-05vs George/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Beattie / Courtney Beall vs Erin Neal / Elizabeth Davis3-6, 0-6
2025-06-04vs Sengsouk/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Spalding / Sandra Elliott vs Alicia Zimmer / Sharling Grummon3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesClair Bartholomew / Christina Beattie vs Beth Gottlieb / Lauren Boyce6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKacey Passmore / Chelsea Rice vs Ryoko Yamanobe / Elita Shalkevich6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Tonia Porter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Noelle Cotey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Sandra Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kacey Passmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Suzanne Spalding
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Clair Bartholomew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Christina Beattie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Katelyn Thorne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Chelsea Rice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Allie Steed
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Eleanor Bartholomew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Victoria Marcella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Lele Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Carey Burch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jenna Hazlewood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noelle Cotey + Kacey Passmore314 matchesnot enough data
Kacey Passmore + Chelsea Rice224 matchesnot enough data
Katelyn Thorne + Victoria Marcella123 matchesnot enough data
Lele Thompson + Eleanor Bartholomew033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tonia Porter
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Noelle Cotey
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Sandra Elliott
5W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Kacey Passmore
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Suzanne Spalding
36W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Clair Bartholomew
18W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Christina Beattie
14W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Katelyn Thorne
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Chelsea Rice
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Allie Steed
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Eleanor Bartholomew
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
Victoria Marcella
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Lele Thompson
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Carey Burch
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Jenna Hazlewood
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.