Teams

NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Prichard

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-10vs NNM 7.0W HP - DelfrateWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Turpie / Leslie Prichard vs Susan Beavis / Liz Maruyama2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJody MacGillivray / Marcie Rackow vs Christine Ellis / Peggy Jenner6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSabrina Goodfellow / Havi Graeber vs Janet Dosher / Kathleen Barrett6-4, 7-6
2023-05-09vs NNM 7.0W TCA - BardSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHavi Graeber / Sabrina Goodfellow vs Dee Burton / Margaret Wienbar6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Hernandez-Wall / Penny Luehring vs Elizabeth Briganti / Terese Bridges6-3, 6-3
2023-05-08vs NNM/Goldstein/55 & Over/7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Turpie / Leslie Prichard vs Lisa Denning / Monica Ontiveros3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarcie Rackow / Cindy Hernandez-Wall vs Lisa Sly / Rae Woods3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErin Black / Jane Depper vs Susanne Anderson / Kathleen O'Bryan4-6, 1-6
2023-05-03vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - GoodrumLost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Black / Jane Depper vs Patty Amo / Mary Mihaly7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Turpie / Emily Kienzle vs Beverly Goodrum / Teresa Stewart6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKay McCormick / Jody MacGillivray vs Colette Fitzpatrick / Serena Taylor4-6, 3-6
2023-04-26vs NNM 7.0W CC - WasloskyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeslie Prichard / Jody MacGillivray vs Kym Burnett / Elizabeth Fleddermann3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKay McCormick / Penny Luehring vs Kim Lovedahl / Elizabeth McGuire2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJane Depper / JT Schneider vs Catherine Porto / Linda Simpson6-1, 6-3
2023-04-19vs NNM 7.0W SV - RussellLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Turpie / Leslie Prichard vs Diana Russell / Monique Archuleta6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarcie Rackow / Jane Depper vs Theresa Trujillo / Kellye Rogers2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSabrina Goodfellow / Jody MacGillivray vs Dottie Anastasi / Sylvia Trujillo1-6, 3-6
2023-04-12vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - LaneLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Hernandez-Wall / Emily Kienzle vs Joan Yourick / Barbara Shulman0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Prichard / Marcie Rackow vs Ellen Herbertson / Dana Fotieo1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSabrina Goodfellow / Laurel Worth vs Barbara McBee / Kay Mixon6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-10vs NNM 7.0W SFTS - KaplanWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Hernandez-Wall / Marcie Rackow vs Yolanda Catanach / Melnda Elisabeth Reed4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErin Black / Laurel Worth vs Leaann Knight / Ellie Dendahl3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesHavi Graeber / Penny Luehring vs Cindy Wilson / Liz Rees6-2, 6-3
2023-03-29vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - KniskernWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Depper / Erin Black vs Jodi Holley / Allison Malone6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHavi Graeber / Penny Luehring vs Celeste Guillebaud / Trina Kniskern3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurel Worth / JT Schneider vs Joanna Jones / K Joann Clemens3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-26vs NNM 7.0W SV - BenschWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Prichard / Cindy Hernandez-Wall vs Tammy Bensch / Krista Ogden1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Kienzle / Laurel Worth vs Lee Cunningham / Karen Barattino6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarah Turpie / Kay McCormick vs Kathy Clapp / Joanne O'Keefe2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Goldstein/55 & Over/7.0W10026417207
2NNM 7.0W SV - Russell82191126226
3NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Goodrum64171330259
4NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Lane55161429233
5NNM 7.0W SV - Bensch55161432261
6NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Prichard55141638291
7NNM 7.0W TCA - Bard45141331267
8NNM 7.0W HP - Delfrate46131738303
9NNM 7.0W SFTS - Kaplan36121534261
10NNM 7.0W CC - Waslosky3792144302
11NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Kniskern1962451302

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Sarah Turpie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Erin Black
published 3.5
3.22
Cindy Hernandez-Wall
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Sabrina Goodfellow
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Emily Kienzle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Havi Graeber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Penny Luehring
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Monette Sedberry
published
2.88
Jody MacGillivray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
JT Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Kay McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jane Depper
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Laurel Worth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Leslie Prichard
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Marcie Rackow
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay McCormick + Jody MacGillivray3449% games+1.6% vs expected
Sabrina Goodfellow + Havi Graeber102142% games−3.2% vs expected
Cindy Hernandez-Wall + Laurel Worth2346% games−3.3% vs expected
Havi Graeber + Penny Luehring143243% games−3.3% vs expected
Leslie Prichard + Marcie Rackow5452% games−3.9% vs expected
Kay McCormick + Penny Luehring3644% games−4.7% vs expected
Sabrina Goodfellow + Penny Luehring31140% games−7.7% vs expected
Emily Kienzle + Leslie Prichard3646% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Turpie
45W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Erin Black
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Hernandez-Wall
57W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Sabrina Goodfellow
47W–113L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Kienzle
44W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Havi Graeber
71W–124L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Penny Luehring
74W–153L career · 4 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Monette Sedberry
48W–43L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
Jody MacGillivray
32W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
JT Schneider
34W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
Kay McCormick
70W–107L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Jane Depper
29W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurel Worth
39W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Prichard
62W–83L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcie Rackow
44W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.