Teams

LAL Fall Mens Tri-level- Tung

2023 WI Tri- Level · WI Tri Level Delta Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.57 / WISCONSIN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-23vs LAL Fall Mens Tri-level-AndyWon 20
W#1 DoublesTung Ouy / Nathan Tunks vs Michael Scott / Randall Moseng6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeffree Herde / Colin Heiderscheit vs John Aschenbrenner / Sureshkumar Mohanarajan6-4, 6-2
2023-10-16vs LAL Fall Mens Tri-level-AndyWon 30
W#1 DoublesGriffin Wagg / Gregory Jameson vs Brennan Quinn / Randall Moseng6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTung Ouy / Bryan Spier vs Andrew Seithamer / Sureshkumar Mohanarajan6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAbhijeet Hange / Kyle Jensen vs Dan Russell / Stanton Loh6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-09vs LAL Fall Mens Tri-level-AndyWon 21
W#1 DoublesGregory Jameson / Bryan Snipes vs Michael Scott / Randall Moseng6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAbhijeet Hange / Bryan Spier vs Dillon Eddingsaas / Brennan Quinn3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEli de Leon / Thomas Dwyer vs Sean O'Flaherty / John Aschenbrenner6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-02vs LAL Fall Mens Tri-level-AndyLost 12
W#1 DoublesBryan Snipes / Nathan Tunks vs Brennan Quinn / Michael Scott6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesThomas Dwyer / Jeffree Herde vs Dillon Eddingsaas / Paul Leithold6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEli de Leon / Peter Waltz vs Dan Russell / John Aschenbrenner1-6, 4-6
2023-09-25vs LAL Fall Mens Tri-level-AndyWon 21
W#1 DoublesTung Ouy / Griffin Wagg vs Sheldon Lee / Randall Moseng7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesThomas Dwyer / Colin Heiderscheit vs Andrew Seithamer / Dillon Eddingsaas5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBryan Spier / Kyle Jensen vs John Aschenbrenner / Stanton Loh6-1, 6-3
2023-09-18vs LAL Fall Mens Tri-level-AndyWon 21
W#1 DoublesBryan Snipes / Gregory Jameson vs Jacob Schafer / Brennan Quinn6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAbhijeet Hange / Colin Heiderscheit vs Paul Leithold / Sureshkumar Mohanarajan7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEli de Leon / Peter Waltz vs Sean O'Flaherty / Stanton Loh0-6, 1-6
2023-09-11vs LAL Fall Mens Tri-level-AndyWon 21
L#1 DoublesNathan Tunks / Griffin Wagg vs Sheldon Lee / Jacob Schafer4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTung Ouy / Jeffree Herde vs Paul Leithold / Dillon Eddingsaas4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAbhijeet Hange / Bryan Spier vs Andrew Seithamer / Dan Russell6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Tri Level Delta Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LAL Fall Mens Tri-level- Tung6115615141
2LAL Fall Mens Tri-level-Andy1661531216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Bryan Snipes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Griffin Wagg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bryan Spier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Colin Heiderscheit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Gregory Jameson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Abhijeet Hange
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Eli de Leon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jeffree Herde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Jensen
published
Nathan Tunks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Waltz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Dwyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tung Ouy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tung Ouy + Nathan Tunks5076% gamesnot enough data
Jeffree Herde + Nathan Tunks033 matchesnot enough data
Colin Heiderscheit + Thomas Dwyer123 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Dwyer + Bryan Spier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Snipes
60W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Griffin Wagg
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Bryan Spier
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Colin Heiderscheit
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Gregory Jameson
22W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Abhijeet Hange
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Eli de Leon
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffree Herde
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kyle Jensen
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nathan Tunks
23W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Waltz
28W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Dwyer
28W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tung Ouy
110W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.