Teams

FIT:Fairfield Drop Shots:Brant/Meskin

2021 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 2.5 W 2

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-06vs WRC:Weston Whirlwinds:MarcusLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Miller / Shannon Wten vs Katie Ferguson / Elizabeth Zeppernick4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnne-Marie Grey vs Marta Mihelic2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Markelon / Julie Shih vs Jennifer Agnes / Orly Angerthal3-6, 1-6
2021-05-22vs WRC:Weston Whirlwinds:MarcusWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Brant / Danielle Meskin vs Jennifer Agnes / Orly Angerthal6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShannon Wten vs Marta Mihelic7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Miller / Seena Cushman vs Kelli Feinstein / Lisa Dalinka6-3, 6-4
2021-05-02vs TCT:2.5 Club ED:Weiss/BosworthLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Brant / Michele Markelon vs Jaime Bosworth / Jennifer Mehta0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Greenblatt / Shannon Wten vs Christina Mink / Marcie Berson4-6, 4-6
2021-04-18vs TCT:2.5 Club ED:Weiss/BosworthLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Brant / Anne-Marie Grey vs Christina Mink / Jennifer Mehta6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDanielle Meskin vs Lisa Barre0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Markelon / Seena Cushman vs Heather Callanan / Kristin DeWitt6-7, 3-6
2021-03-28vs WRC:Weston Whirlwinds:MarcusLost 12
W#1 DoublesDanielle Meskin / Debra Miller vs Kim Lynn / Katie Ferguson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnne-Marie Grey vs Marta Mihelic1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Natarajan / Shannon Wten vs Elizabeth Zeppernick / Anne Marcus4-6, 0-6
2021-02-28vs WRC:Weston Whirlwinds:MarcusLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne-Marie Grey / Seena Cushman vs Orly Angerthal / Kim Lynn5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDanielle Meskin vs Anne Marcus6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Markelon / Julie Shih vs Kelli Feinstein / Pallavi Debnath5-7, 3-6
2021-02-13vs TCT:2.5 Club ED:Weiss/BosworthLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Markelon / Debra Miller vs Ann Weiss / Kristin DeWitt1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDanielle Meskin vs Jaime Bosworth2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Greenblatt / Jill Brant vs Heather Callanan / Christina Mink1-6, 3-6
2020-11-15vs D - MIT:2.5 Weekend:LorenzettiLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne-Marie Grey / Seena Cushman vs Radka Lorenzetti / Lily Philben1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJill Brant vs Deirdre Hall3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Natarajan / Julie Shih vs Sandra White / Svetlana Maisheva6-7, 3-6
2020-11-01vs TCT:2.5 Club ED:Weiss/BosworthLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Brant / Danielle Meskin vs Jaime Bosworth / Maureen Greenberg3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichele Markelon vs Lisa Barre0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne-Marie Grey / Danielle Natarajan vs Ann Weiss / Jennifer Mehta2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 W 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Shannon Wten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Debra Miller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.32
Danielle Meskin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.29
Jill Brant
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Anne-Marie Grey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.03
Michele Markelon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Danielle Natarajan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Shih
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Greenblatt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Meskin + Jill Brant111049% games+7.1% vs expected
Anne-Marie Grey + Michele Markelon3740% games−9.0% vs expected
Anne-Marie Grey + Jill Brant044 matchesnot enough data
Anne-Marie Grey + Danielle Meskin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Wten
25W–17L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Debra Miller
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Danielle Meskin
25W–46L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
92%8%<1%
2.32
Jill Brant
33W–48L career · 6 lines in 2021
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Anne-Marie Grey
14W–33L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele Markelon
19W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Danielle Natarajan
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Shih
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamela Greenblatt
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.