Teams

18 & Over 3.0X Foster - TCA

2026 USTA Mixed 18 & Over League - NNM · 3.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-07-16vs 18 & Over Udell 3.0X - ACCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaryl Landavazo / Valkyrie Musarra vs Aubry James / Adam James6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Ashton / Mark Lovato vs Peter Eicker / Andrea Eicker6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLucas Salazar / Jaymie Roybal vs Katie Dolan / Jon Patterson6-1, 6-2
2026-07-12vs 18 & Over Udell 3.0X - ACCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeff Fredine / Elizabeth Ashton vs Peter Eicker / Andrea Eicker6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatthew Cardenas / Monica Foster vs Karen Udell / Jon Patterson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLucas Salazar / Jaymie Roybal vs Shelley Silverman / David Silverman6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Allysa Gambarella
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Jeff Fredine
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Daryl Landavazo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Monica Foster
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Valkyrie Musarra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Elizabeth Ashton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Dana Hanisee
published 3
Heath Hanshaw
published 3
2.73
Matthew Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Jaymie Roybal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Bell
published
Lucas Salazar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Lovato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Sonnier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Foster + Daryl Landavazo4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allysa Gambarella
50W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
Jeff Fredine
63W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Daryl Landavazo
66W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Monica Foster
108W–87L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Valkyrie Musarra
116W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Elizabeth Ashton
52W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Dana Hanisee
78W–54L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Heath Hanshaw
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Cardenas
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Jaymie Roybal
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
Kimberly Bell
37W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lucas Salazar
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Lovato
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Steve Sonnier
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.