Teams

WNCA Salter (Aston Park)

Mixed 18 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 18+ Mixed 4.0 - Thursday PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-17vs WNCG Sandlin (Aston Park)Won 21
L#1 DoublesZan Price / Jennie West vs Andrew McIntyre / Jane Christen2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMadan Gurukar / Amanda Williams vs Emerson Ellis / Alexandra Moody6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnne Salter / David Bartholomew vs Susanna Saidi / Gene Sandlin6-4, 7-5
2025-06-26vs WNCG Sandlin (Aston Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMadan Gurukar / Rawson Baylor vs Dayne Topkin / Erin Beacham2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonald Kusz / Jennie West vs Lee Carson / Hunter Carson1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesColby Caldwell / Anne Salter vs Emerson Ellis / Jane Christen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-05vs WNCG Sandlin (Aston Park)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesColby Caldwell / Jennie West vs Gene Sandlin / Susanna Saidi4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Williams / Madan Gurukar vs Alexandra Moody / John Danko6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRawson Baylor / Donald Kusz vs Erin Beacham / Dayne Topkin3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Mixed 4.0 - Thursday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Zan Price
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Jennie West
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Anne Salter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Colby Caldwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Mary Ann Wendel
published
3.53
Donald Kusz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Madan Gurukar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rawson Baylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Salter + Colby Caldwell0540% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zan Price
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.98
Jennie West
40W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Anne Salter
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Colby Caldwell
7W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Mary Ann Wendel
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
Donald Kusz
17W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.53
Madan Gurukar
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rawson Baylor
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.