Teams

Chattahoochee River Club (Dana Morrison)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Low · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List)

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Winski
published 4
3.72
Karen Fullett
published
3.63
Michelle Burke
published
3.52
Sarah Pender
published
3.39
Bernadette Graham
published 3.5
3.33
Nancy Utz
published
3.31
Erin Deady
published 3.5
3.21
Jennifer Volk
published
3.09
Heidi Stoneking
published 3.5
Holli Collinson
published
Mandy Hall
published
Michelle Jenkins
published
SARAH STARK
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Fullett + Bernadette Graham6845% games−4.0% vs expected
Nancy Utz + Heidi Stoneking4649% games−5.5% vs expected
Mandy Hall + Jennifer Volk134 matchesnot enough data
Bernadette Graham + Christine Winski224 matchesnot enough data
SARAH STARK + Sarah Pender224 matchesnot enough data
Holli Collinson + Michelle Jenkins213 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Hall + Erin Deady123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Winski
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Fullett
22W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Michelle Burke
7W–17L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Sarah Pender
51W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Bernadette Graham
38W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Nancy Utz
40W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Erin Deady
15W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Jennifer Volk
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Heidi Stoneking
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Holli Collinson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mandy Hall
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Jenkins
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
SARAH STARK
18W–51L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.