Teams

JByrd-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening

12 players · average NTRP 4.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-30vs DVyas-ENOWon 10
W#2 DoublesGavin Mazurak / Migel Hidalgo Saldana vs Kyle Faltisco / Dipen Vyas6-1, 6-1
2024-08-30vs KRamaswamy-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesMigel Hidalgo Saldana / Vamsee Pasangulapati vs Praveen Yadav / Nitni Agrawal1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-08-23vs JMontague-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesVisakan Jayakumar / Vamsee Pasangulapati vs David Schumann / Rick Leib6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMigel Hidalgo Saldana / Eduardo Schlotterhausen vs Myong Michael Lee / Christopher Lott6-0, 6-1
2024-08-02vs DVyas-ENOWon 10
W#3 DoublesMigel Hidalgo Saldana / Gavin Mazurak vs Richard Griffin / Dipen Vyas6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Brian Song
published 4.5
4.23
Visakan Jayakumar
published
4.09
Migel Hidalgo Saldana
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Aubry Carmody
published 4
3.88
3.81
Vamsee Pasangulapati
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Ryan Kessler
published
3.72
Benjamin Katz
published 4
3.70
Gavin Mazurak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
3.61
Matthew Curry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Migel Hidalgo Saldana + Gavin Mazurak404 matchesnot enough data
Jermaine Byrd + Migel Hidalgo Saldana213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Song
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
Visakan Jayakumar
24W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Migel Hidalgo Saldana
98W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 8 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Aubry Carmody
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
Manuel Mariategui Vargas
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Vamsee Pasangulapati
133W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Ryan Kessler
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Benjamin Katz
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Gavin Mazurak
119W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
Eduardo Schlotterhausen
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
Matthew Curry
29W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.