Teams

KY/LEX/Castle

2025 USTA FALL LEAGUE 18 & Over · 3.5 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-04vs KY/LEX/NiDiWon 21
W#1 DoublesDoris Senters / Kristen Tewell vs Emily Pernice / Madison Liford6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLydia Stout vs Patty Ni6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCathy Corales / Jennifer Wilson vs Sophie Schmidt / Aya Tsuchiya3-6, 4-6
2025-11-16vs KY/LEX/OverstreetWon 21
L#1 DoublesMargaret de Movellan / Kirsten van Haaren vs Allison Overstreet / Meghan Simonsen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCallie Manor vs Lee Walker6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDoris Senters / Lydia Stout vs Rhonda Hilton / Lindsey Gerhard6-3, 7-5
2025-11-07vs KY/LEX/CoyLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Delahanty / Jennifer Wilson vs Janine Coy / Hiroko Nakata0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinn Jefferson / Cristi Hundley vs Emily Diehl / Amber Brown2-6, 4-6
2025-11-02vs KY/LEX/SwansegarWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelinda McClain / Shera Moulton vs Brooke Marnitz / Jennifer Strange1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLydia Stout vs Elizabeth Hardwick6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Castle / Kristen Tewell vs Victoria Sward / Elissaveta Arnaoudova6-1, 6-0
2025-10-29vs KY/LEX/NiDiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCathy Corales / Shera Moulton vs Leah Lykins / Dana Gerken4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDoris Senters / Lydia Stout vs Patty Ni / Madison Liford6-3, 6-1
2025-10-15vs KY/LEX/OverstreetWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelinda McClain / Cristi Hundley vs Meghan Simonsen / Rachael Carroll6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMily Ralsten vs Layne Cutler7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKirsten van Haaren / Doris Senters vs Rhonda Hilton / Taylor Wilcox7-5, 7-5
2025-10-14vs KY/LEX/SwansegarWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Castle / Kirsten van Haaren vs Laura Kennoy / Brooke Marnitz3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCallie Manor vs Victoria Sward6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMily Ralsten / Sarah Delahanty vs Maria del Mar Landron / Monica Mestanza6-2, 7-5
2025-10-12vs KY/LEX/CoyWon 21
L#1 DoublesDoris Senters / Shera Moulton vs Janine Coy / Hiroko Nakata4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLydia Stout vs Kaylie Polston2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Tewell / Margaret de Movellan vs Amy Worthington Johnson / Karen Sandberg6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Kirsten van Haaren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Melinda McClain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Lydia Stout
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Callie Manor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Kristen Tewell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Linn Jefferson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Margaret de Movellan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Sarah Delahanty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Mily Ralsten
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Shera Moulton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Doris Senters
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
3.15
Cristi Hundley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Lisa Castle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Cathy Corales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doris Senters + Kirsten van Haaren9258% games+5.5% vs expected
Melinda McClain + Doris Senters13162% games+5.1% vs expected
Kristen Tewell + Doris Senters6351% games−0.2% vs expected
Linn Jefferson + Margaret de Movellan4551% games−4.6% vs expected
Mily Ralsten + Doris Senters224 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Corales + Shera Moulton123 matchesnot enough data
Mily Ralsten + Kirsten van Haaren303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirsten van Haaren
30W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Melinda McClain
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Lydia Stout
14W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Callie Manor
61W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kristen Tewell
20W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Linn Jefferson
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Margaret de Movellan
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Sarah Delahanty
30W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Mily Ralsten
14W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Shera Moulton
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Doris Senters
60W–44L career · 11 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Cristi Hundley
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Lisa Castle
22W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Cathy Corales
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.