Teams

2-JByrd/SLlewellyn-Eno

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-11vs 4-MHanauer-EnoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRyan Berliner / Andrew Perdue vs Matthew Hanauer / Luc Sanchez4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrett Eckles / Akihiro Hamada vs Ryan Lewis / Thomas Gaither6-0, 6-2
2023-09-27vs 5-SStark-SVCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJustin Akonful / Brett Eckles vs William Sendor / David Baddour6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Ryan Berliner vs Kenneth Nelson / Christian Shelby1-6, 6-7
2023-09-26vs 5-SStark-SVCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Rees / Brett Eckles vs Christian Shelby / Kenneth Nelson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-13vs 1-RMcClenny-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrett Eckles / Gaurav Luther vs Connor Wilkins / Christopher Irvine6-7, 1-6
2023-09-11vs 4-MHanauer-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrett Eckles / Spencer Llewellyn vs Matthew Hanauer / Thomas Gaither6-7, 4-6
2023-09-06vs 3-KMoyung-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrett Eckles / Gaurav Luther vs Kevin Moyung / Ryan Sayko6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRyan Berliner / Tommy Hibbs vs Muthu Chidambaram / Justin Fowler6-3, 6-4
2023-08-09vs 3-KMoyung-EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrett Eckles / Spencer Llewellyn vs Naveen Natesh / Jack Hu6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.43
Brett Eckles
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.41
Justin Akonful
published
4.27
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Gaurav Luther
published
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.75
Ryan Berliner
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Eckles + Andrew Perdue5254% games+4.2% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Spencer Llewellyn + Ryan Berliner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Perdue
33W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
4.43
Justin Akonful
14W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
230W–157L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
Gaurav Luther
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.25
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 10 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Ryan Berliner
113W–104L career · 8 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.