Teams

BETC-Ikeda

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-18vs AYTC-Aces Only-EdwardsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBruce Colley / Mark Weiser vs Hung Nguyen / Steven Ehrlich7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoy Higashi / Zane Blegen vs Mike Rasanen / Rick Olson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Benoit / Mark Blaisdell vs Mike Rayburn / Kenn Wildes6-2, 7-6
2023-10-29vs AYTC-Aces Only-EdwardsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBruce Colley / Mark Weiser vs Hung Nguyen / Everett Seven7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick Mason / Roy Higashi vs Mike Rasanen / Mike Rayburn7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Benoit / Tony Shaheen vs Kenn Wildes / Rodney Rowen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-20vs PL-TiedemanLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoy Higashi / Tony Shaheen vs Min Lin / Gregory Snow3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Mason / Zane Blegen vs Norm Escover / Wade Tiedeman6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Benoit / Jim Dugan vs Ramesh Ganesh / Alex Coffey6-4, 6-4
2023-10-14vs STC-RevereLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Erickson / Patrick Mason vs Mark Revere / Karl Crabs6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Weiser / Michael Duby vs Jeff Feinstein / James Romano0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBOB BOWEN / Bruce Colley vs Mark Callaghan / Matthew Barnes4-6, 0-6
2023-10-08vs MC-SatoLost 03
L#1 DoublesTony Shaheen / Roy Higashi vs Noel Balantac / Frank Weathers6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Blaisdell / Michael Duby vs Alvin Sato / Jay Wellan6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesZane Blegen / Jim Dugan vs Glynn Omoto / PETER VANDERLINDEN2-6, 2-6
2023-10-01vs NTC-String Theory-BurnsLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Erickson / Mark Blaisdell vs Eric Cobb / Rowland Morgan1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMark Weiser / Michael Duby vs Stefan Cobb / Todd Dunnington4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBOB BOWEN / Daniel Benoit vs Christopher van Holmes / Andy Rottler5-7, 5-7
2023-09-24vs CAC/SL-GarsideLost 03
L#1 DoublesTony Shaheen / Roy Higashi vs Martin Ruscha / Joey Collins5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Colley / Michael Duby vs Vincent Choi / Mariano Ortiz Jr6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Benoit / Steven Erickson vs AL King / Bill Mulliken4-6, 4-6
2023-09-16vs HBSQ-Hammers-PolettiLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Weiser / BOB BOWEN vs Bruce Adee / Paul Lorring0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBruce Colley / Mark Blaisdell vs Scott Chapman / Duane Hauer6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJim Dugan / Zane Blegen vs Michael Lynagh / Scott Schlumberger3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Roy Higashi
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
BOB BOWEN
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Daniel Benoit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Mark Weiser
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Bruce Colley
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.19
Steven Erickson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Tony Shaheen
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Steve Ikeda
published 3.5
3.00
Mark Blaisdell
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jim Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Duby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Mason
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Zane Blegen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Weiser + Steven Erickson7358% games+7.1% vs expected
Roy Higashi + Steven Erickson5363% games+5.5% vs expected
Tony Shaheen + Roy Higashi4552% games−1.7% vs expected
Mark Blaisdell + Mark Weiser1543% games−5.0% vs expected
Mark Blaisdell + Steven Erickson2642% games−10.7% vs expected
Tony Shaheen + Steven Erickson2441% games−16.6% vs expected
Bruce Colley + BOB BOWEN2834% gamesnot enough data
Steve Ikeda + Patrick Mason6364% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Roy Higashi
281W–155L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
BOB BOWEN
31W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Benoit
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Mark Weiser
64W–72L career · 9 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Bruce Colley
44W–72L career · 9 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Steven Erickson
37W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Tony Shaheen
33W–37L career · 9 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Steve Ikeda
40W–32L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Mark Blaisdell
31W–59L career · 8 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.00
Jim Dugan
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Duby
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Mason
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zane Blegen
17W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.