Teams

B8 Woodlake Elliott Aces Wild

2021 Richmond Combo Mixed · Combo Mixed 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-06vs B7 MAC Talamo 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Eugene Johnson vs Donna Talamo / Matt Talamo6-2, 7-5
2021-10-24vs B6 WOCC StallsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGene Zaretski / Stacey Cabral vs Jessica Morton / Andrew Thompson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Wray Brawley vs Anne-Marie Anderson / Jonathan Stalls6-2, 6-4
2021-10-17vs B4 Burkwood NoelWon 10
W#2 DoublesGene Zaretski / Stacey Cabral vs Jonathan Kovarcik / Kathleen Stull6-3, 6-4
2021-10-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesGene Zaretski / Irene Shepherd vs Susan Long / Thomas Threadgold6-4, 6-1
2021-10-03vs B9 ACAC Hatcher HittersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacey Cabral / Brian Elliott vs Thomas Wilson / Lisa Aaron7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoe Fowler / Irene Shepherd vs Brian Nalls / Alicia Zatcoff3-6, 2-6
2021-09-19vs B5 WOCC FordWon 10
W#1 DoublesGene Zaretski / Stacey Cabral vs Brian Ford / Melissa Mathe6-1, 6-2
2021-09-12vs B3 Kings Charter RamserWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacey Cabral / Joe Fowler vs Ariel Koenig / Julius Anongos6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWray Brawley / Irene Shepherd vs Wendy Malamphy / Tim Malamphy7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Stacey Cabral
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Irene Shepherd
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Joe Fowler
published
3.08
Dave McCoy
published 3.5
2.97
Wray Brawley
published
2.75
Allie Hannon
published 3
Eugene Johnson
published 3
Gene Zaretski
published 3
2.05
Sharon McCoy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacey Cabral
217W–103L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Irene Shepherd
111W–81L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Joe Fowler
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Dave McCoy
9W–14L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
Wray Brawley
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Allie Hannon
28W–40L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Eugene Johnson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Gene Zaretski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon McCoy
0W–8L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.