Teams

Allie B

Tri-Level -Spring · Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-02vs Christie WLost 12
W#1 DoublesKima Kimura / Allison Erickson vs Lucille Abe / Trena Rairdon6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNancy Scheetz-Freymiller / Conita Mullett vs Jessie Lief / Marlys Morton0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBarbara Jacobs / Allison Burand vs Christie Wyzykowski / Daniella DeLozier5-7, 3-6
2022-04-01vs CathyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Erickson / April Korshin vs Catherine Stone / Triin Minton7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Scheetz-Freymiller / Jennifer Duclos vs Susan Brunner / Stacia Green4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAllison Burand / Bonnie Wickham vs Julie Raymond-Yakoubian / Lori Kaltenbach1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-27vs CathyLost 03
L#1 DoublesApril Korshin / Nancy Scheetz-Freymiller vs Catherine Stone / Stacia Green2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConita Mullett / Jennifer Duclos vs Dana Griffin / Triin Minton2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Burand / Barbara Jacobs vs Song Bliss / Susan Brunner6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-26vs Christie WLost 12
W#1 DoublesAllison Erickson / Kima Kimura vs Marlys Morton / Lucille Abe6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesConita Mullett / Jennifer Duclos vs Jessie Lief / Daniella DeLozier3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBarbara Jacobs / Bonnie Wickham vs Christie Wyzykowski / Cynthia Henie1-6, 5-7
2022-03-26vs RebeccaLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Scheetz-Freymiller / April Korshin vs Karen Loeffler / Nicolle Welch6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesConita Mullett / Kima Kimura vs Zareena Clendaniel / Paige Thorne4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Christie W5112613135
2Cathy4211717137
3Allie B1441123162
4Women Draft000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Allison Erickson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
April Korshin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Kima Kimura
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jennifer Duclos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Nancy Scheetz-Freymiller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Conita Mullett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Allison Burand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Barbara Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bonnie Wickham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April Korshin + Kima Kimura3451% games+5.9% vs expected
Allison Burand + Conita Mullett5548% games−1.9% vs expected
Nancy Scheetz-Freymiller + Jennifer Duclos123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Erickson
166W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
April Korshin
113W–101L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Kima Kimura
33W–36L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Jennifer Duclos
76W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Nancy Scheetz-Freymiller
27W–50L career · type M · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Conita Mullett
83W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Allison Burand
50W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Barbara Jacobs
21W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Bonnie Wickham
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.