Teams

CCC QUEVEDO

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-11vs STC KANELost 13
L#1 DoublesNancy Jeter / Kasey Schrimpf vs Carter Purcell / Pam Allen2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBrittany Reid vs Kristina Hodges0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesErin Silva vs Tabitha Kane7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStephanie Quevedo / Vivian Campbell vs Elena Batsalkin / Elizabeth Tuazon Perez1-6, 2-6
2025-03-07vs RID SLESINGERLost 05
L#1 DoublesCortney Pelley / Abigail Bebee vs Molly Davidson / Sara Slesinger1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJobi Heartsill vs Elora Moore3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Lynch / Kasey Schrimpf vs Caroline Kirkpatrick / Abby Henegan3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesStephanie Quevedo vs Christina Swiger4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Neill / Elise Mederos vs Melissa Otto / Brooke McWhirter0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Emily Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Erin Silva
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Nancy Jeter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Melinda Bonnell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Jobi Heartsill
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.76
Elise Mederos
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Courtney Tulbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Candi Goodlett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Stephanie Quevedo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.68
Kasey Schrimpf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Cortney Pelley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Ashley Neill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Abigail Bebee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Stephanie Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Vivian Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Brittany Reid
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.46
Erika McCarthy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Bonnell + Candi Goodlett6747% games+0.8% vs expected
Cortney Pelley + Abigail Bebee1640% games−0.7% vs expected
Erin Silva + Kasey Schrimpf314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Jeter + Kasey Schrimpf123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Dalton
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Erin Silva
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Nancy Jeter
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Melinda Bonnell
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Jobi Heartsill
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Elise Mederos
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Courtney Tulbert
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Candi Goodlett
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Stephanie Quevedo
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Kasey Schrimpf
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Cortney Pelley
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Ashley Neill
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Abigail Bebee
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Stephanie Lynch
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Vivian Campbell
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Brittany Reid
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Erika McCarthy
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.