Teams

GSTL18/Fedele/GrandeDunes

2026 Combo 18 & Over-GSTL · Adult Men - 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Dunes Golf and Beach Club
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Grande Dunes Tennis Club
2026-08-25vs GSTL18/Phillips/DunesLost 12
L#1 DoublesAxel Salinas / Daniel Fedele vs David Lazar / Byron David1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Smith / Kenneth Santiago vs Radley Short / Ryan Massey7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesReid Moman / Patrick Corbett vs Jay Bonnoitt / Robert Merritt6-3, 6-3
2026-08-11vs GSTL18/Phillips/DunesWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerry Walden / Tom McKeever vs Byron David / Gabriel Phillips3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJessel Elliott / Ryan Smith vs Brett Yates / Vasilios Pournaras6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKenneth Santiago / Peter Laptewicz vs Alec Marinaro / Ryan Massey2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Adult Men - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GSTL18/Fedele/GrandeDunes1021427

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kenneth Santiago
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Jessel Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Daniel Fedele
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Terry Walden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Reid Moman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Roberto Ferraro
published
2.93
Tom McKeever
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Carl King
published 3
2.80
Peter Laptewicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Axel Salinas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Patrick Corbett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Walden + Daniel Fedele0523% gamesnot enough data
Terry Walden + Kenneth Santiago213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Santiago
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jessel Elliott
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Daniel Fedele
16W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Terry Walden
27W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Reid Moman
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Roberto Ferraro
16W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Tom McKeever
18W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Carl King
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Peter Laptewicz
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Axel Salinas
3W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Patrick Corbett
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.