Teams

Lori's Team

2022 Springfield Adult Trilevel · Mixed Winter Trilevel Flex

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-20vs Hee-Sun's TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarmen Broadbent / Benjamin Mowris vs Hee-Sun Kim / Bradley Brotherton4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLeslie Echols / James Tucker vs Carol Goldstein / Gabriel Goldstein6-2, 6-4
W#4 DoublesSusan Gravatt / Kirk Skinner vs Carolyn Hanger / James Hilbert6-4, 7-5
2022-01-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesDebbie Cunningham / Benjamin Mowris vs Hee-Sun Kim / Matthew Murrow5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-02vs Hee-Sun's TeamWon 30
W#2 DoublesDebbie Cunningham / Benjamin Mowris vs Katherine Clouse / David Lane6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCandise Kroutil / Austin Propst vs Margaret Cleveland / Nick Hansen6-2, 6-1
W#4 DoublesLeslie Echols / James Tucker vs Carol Goldstein / Gabriel Goldstein6-2, 6-3
2021-12-19vs Hee-Sun's TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebbie Cunningham / Benjamin Mowris vs Debbie Pell / Dennis Mailes6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Darrah / James Tucker vs Carolyn Hanger / David Lane6-3, 7-6
2021-12-12vs Hee-Sun's TeamWon 20
W#3 DoublesLeslie Echols / James Tucker vs Melissa Cox / Gabriel Goldstein6-2, 6-1
W#4 DoublesKirk Skinner / Candise Kroutil vs Debbie Pell / James Hilbert6-3, 6-0
2021-12-05Lost 12
L#2 DoublesLeslie Echols / Benjamin Mowris vs Katherine Clouse / Dennis Mailes6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGautam Yadav / Debbie Cunningham vs Margaret Cleveland / Matthew Murrow6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#4 DoublesSusan Gravatt / Kirk Skinner vs Melissa Cox / Nick Hansen6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed Winter Trilevel Flex have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Brian Hillman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Benjamin Mowris
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Carol Mailes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Carmen Broadbent
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.56
Leslie Echols
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
3.27
Kimberly Darrah
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gautam Yadav
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Austin Propst
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Lori Young
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Candise Kroutil
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Debbie Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
James Tucker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Kirk Skinner
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Gravatt
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Young + Kimberly Darrah81047% games+2.3% vs expected
Carmen Broadbent + Leslie Echols9452% games+1.7% vs expected
Debbie Cunningham + Carol Mailes224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Gravatt + Leslie Echols314 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Cunningham + Benjamin Mowris213 matchesnot enough data
Carol Mailes + Brian Hillman123 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Echols + James Tucker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Hillman
7W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Benjamin Mowris
25W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Carol Mailes
55W–24L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Carmen Broadbent
31W–22L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Leslie Echols
111W–71L career · 12 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kimberly Darrah
27W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Gautam Yadav
7W–2L career · type M · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Austin Propst
34W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lori Young
17W–41L career · 7 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Candise Kroutil
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Debbie Cunningham
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
James Tucker
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kirk Skinner
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Gravatt
29W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.