Teams

Hermitage Blankley

2025 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-23vs Willow Oaks - BlackwoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Kelly / Stephanie Yablonski vs Ingrid Hale / Jeffrey Begin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-11-20vs MAC Scott 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Wycinsky / JR Pruden vs David Whitall / Beth Morris6-3, 6-3
2025-10-26vs Woodlake OD - OdonnellWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelby Morgan / Stephanie Yablonski vs Michael Cousineau / Elizabeth Hoover6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-25vs Burkwood Colgin 7.5 Combo MixWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Ryan Politowicz vs Jennifer Owens / Mike Davis6-1, 6-4
2025-10-11vs Westwood Hause 7.5 Combo MixLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Politowicz / Stephanie Yablonski vs Elizabeth Kelly / Michael Flynn2-6, 4-6
2025-09-28vs ACAC Singh 7.5 Combo MixWon 10
W#2 DoublesJR Pruden / Michelle Wycinsky vs Abbe Voigt / Jason Voigt6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Michelle Wycinsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Abbey Orski
published 4
3.72
Ryan Politowicz
published
3.65
Kathleen Crotty
published
3.62
Kelby Morgan
published
3.46
Stephanie Yablonski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
ANJA BAUGH
published 3.5
3.23
Sarah Martin
published
3.16
JR Pruden
published
2.83
David Blankley
published 3
Paul Kelly
published
Will Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Crotty + David Blankley4156% gamesnot enough data
Abbey Orski + JR Pruden314 matchesnot enough data
Kelby Morgan + Abbey Orski123 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Martin + Will Martin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michelle Wycinsky
120W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Abbey Orski
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Ryan Politowicz
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kathleen Crotty
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Kelby Morgan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Stephanie Yablonski
124W–85L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
ANJA BAUGH
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sarah Martin
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
JR Pruden
29W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
David Blankley
19W–27L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Paul Kelly
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Will Martin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.