← Teams

THPRD-Lee/Blebea

2019 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.69 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
NANDA SIDDAIAH
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Cheri Martes Davis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
Devin McMasters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
John Yu
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Vivian Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
—
Craig Putnam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Dan Boren
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.70
Diana Blebea
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-03-02Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJohn Yu / Vivian Nguyen vs Suzy Rylander / Kurt Rylander7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNANDA SIDDAIAH / Diana Blebea vs Tammy LaFrazia / Andy LaFrazia6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDevin McMasters / Andrea Vicino vs Jacqueline Wilcox / Lee Wilcox7-5, 6-3
2019-02-24Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesJohn Yu / Diana Blebea vs Seth Wagner / Courtney Storrs7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDevin McMasters / Angie Lee vs Frank Mathews / Kristen Kopack6-4, 7-5
2019-02-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesNANDA SIDDAIAH / Diana Blebea vs Holly Kanz / John Kin6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheri Martes Davis / Craig Putnam vs Jennifer Lucas / David Lucas6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDan Boren / Vivian Nguyen vs Joy Meyers / Daniel Turner6-1, 6-4
2019-02-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesCheri Martes Davis / Craig Putnam vs Marjorie Brinck / Gunnar Brinck6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Devin McMasters vs Nancy Osborne / Stephen Osborne6-0, 7-5
2019-02-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesCheri Martes Davis / John Yu vs Jeff Lipke / Toni Eastwood7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDevin McMasters / Andrea Vicino vs Bill Lowblad / Mary Lowblad6-3, 6-4
2019-01-26Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDan Boren / Cheri Martes Davis vs Kristi Vargas / Frank Brown4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Putnam / Vivian Nguyen vs Nora Semonsen / Paul Kachel7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNANDA SIDDAIAH / Diana Blebea vs Ann Skoog / Douglas Brewer6-0, 6-2
2019-01-18Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDan Boren / Vivian Nguyen vs Tae Dong Kim / Jenna Dornblaser6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNANDA SIDDAIAH / Diana Blebea vs Cassia Carpio / Neerav Shah6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJackie Konen / Craig Putnam vs Hoon Shin / Boon Yon Joung6-1, 6-3
2019-01-11Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesDan Boren / Vivian Nguyen vs Lisa Shantley / Derek Carlson6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Yu / Cheri Martes Davis vs Kirk Planck / Carla Wheeler3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
NANDA SIDDAIAH
69W–31L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Cheri Martes Davis
106W–49L career
1%98%0%
3.73
4
Devin McMasters
90W–74L career
14%86%0%
3.59
4
John Yu
136W–65L career
32%68%0%
3.50
3.5
Vivian Nguyen
178W–99L career
0%98%2%
3.37
3.5
Craig Putnam
20W–11L career · type M
not enough data
—
3.5
Dan Boren
44W–39L career
8%89%2%
3.22
3
Diana Blebea
90W–67L career
3%97%0%
2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.