Teams

NNM 8.0M Wiley - JC

2024 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-16vs NNM/Stephens/65 & Over/8.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesHenry Brantley / David Walsh vs James Topmiller / Tom Weeks6-4, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel McClanahan / Monte Woods vs David Harnick / Ty Martello4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Gee / Keith Kollarik vs Vahl Jackson / Frederick Ellis2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-09vs NNM/Stephens/65 & Over/8.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarck Wright / Henry Brantley vs Roy McKinney / David Harnick6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Barker / James Gee vs Frederick Ellis / Tom Arnold7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeith Kollarik / Monte Woods vs Tom Weeks / Kenneth Harper7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-02vs NNM/Stephens/65 & Over/8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesRandy Smith / Daniel McClanahan vs David Harnick / Roger Prucino0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Wiley / Robert Bustos vs Kenneth Harper / Vahl Jackson6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLeo Romero / Richard Schaefer vs Daniel Stephens / Peter Korsan1-6, 2-6
2024-09-25vs NNM/Stephens/65 & Over/8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarck Wright / David Walsh vs Peter Korsan / James Topmiller4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKeith Kollarik / Bruce Burnham vs Ty Martello / Tom Arnold6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMonte Woods / James Gee vs Kenneth Harper / Daniel Stephens7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-18vs NNM/Stephens/65 & Over/8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Wiley / David Walsh vs Vahl Jackson / James Topmiller1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRandy Smith / Daniel McClanahan vs Frederick Ellis / Paul Wantuck2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Herrera / Marck Wright vs Tom Arnold / Roy McKinney2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-11vs NNM/Stephens/65 & Over/8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Bustos / Keith Kollarik vs Roger Prucino / Peter Korsan1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Barker / James Gee vs Ty Martello / Frederick Ellis6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLeo Romero / Richard Schaefer vs Roy McKinney / Daniel Stephens0-6, 1-6
2024-09-04vs NNM/Stephens/65 & Over/8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Herrera / Marck Wright vs Peter Korsan / Kenneth Harper4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Wiley / Henry Brantley vs Vahl Jackson / Tom Arnold3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKeith Kollarik / Bruce Burnham vs Daniel Stephens / Ty Martello7-5, 6-0
2024-08-28vs NNM/Stephens/65 & Over/8.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Walsh / Marck Wright vs Kenneth Harper / Tom Arnold6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Barker / Randy Smith vs Frederick Ellis / Paul Wantuck2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMonte Woods / Daniel McClanahan vs Roy McKinney / Tom Weeks6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Stephens/65 & Over/8.0M7117722202
2NNM 8.0M Wiley - JC1771739268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Walsh
published 4
3.63
Bruce Burnham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Kevin Wiley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Robert Bustos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Daniel McClanahan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Michael Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
James Gee
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Douglas Oltmans
published
Henry Brantley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Keith Kollarik
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Leo Romero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marck Wright
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Monte Woods
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Barker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Schaefer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Douglas Oltmans + Kevin Wiley4649% gamesnot enough data
James Gee + Richard Barker3252% gamesnot enough data
Daniel McClanahan + David Walsh314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Herrera + Robert Bustos033 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Oltmans + Bruce Burnham033 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Burnham + Daniel McClanahan033 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Burnham + David Walsh213 matchesnot enough data
Marck Wright + Keith Kollarik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Walsh
22W–44L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Bruce Burnham
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Kevin Wiley
31W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Robert Bustos
25W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Daniel McClanahan
73W–103L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
Michael Herrera
73W–95L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.39
James Gee
45W–133L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Douglas Oltmans
46W–57L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Henry Brantley
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Keith Kollarik
34W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leo Romero
3W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marck Wright
34W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Monte Woods
24W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Barker
43W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Schaefer
11W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.