Teams

Signature Shots

2025 Corpus Christi USPTA Fall League · Ladies 3.5 Flight

20 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 3.5 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Jeannel Hinton
published
3.59
Jane Huston
published
3.32
3.26
Kathy Kramer
published
Ashley Beyer Ray
published 3.5
3.25
Jennifer Maingot
published
3.18
Vicki Jamison
published
3.15
Martha Planutis
published
3.09
Nadalin Sarchet
published
3.08
Laura Bartlett
published
3.03
Nikki Viersen
published
3.03
Mirna Gracia
published
3.02
Margot Hopkins
published
2.94
Lynne Lassig
published
2.92
Grace Hammack
published
2.82
Ginny Bell
published
2.78
Maggie Pustejovsky
published
2.76
Cathy Dooley
published 3
2.74
Cathy McCoy
published 3
Suzie Bartels
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannel Hinton + Jane Huston6166% games+23.1% vs expected
Jane Huston + Nikki Viersen7267% games+9.1% vs expected
Kathy Kramer + Stephanie Kenigsberg6457% games+3.2% vs expected
Jennifer Maingot + Margot Hopkins8555% games−0.1% vs expected
Cathy McCoy + Cathy Dooley2346% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Jamison + Cathy Dooley314 matchesnot enough data
Vicki Jamison + Cathy McCoy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeannel Hinton
28W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
Jane Huston
36W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.59
Stephanie Kenigsberg
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Kathy Kramer
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Ashley Beyer Ray
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Maingot
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Vicki Jamison
44W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Martha Planutis
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Nadalin Sarchet
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Laura Bartlett
24W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Nikki Viersen
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Mirna Gracia
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Margot Hopkins
27W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Lynne Lassig
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Grace Hammack
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Ginny Bell
6W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Maggie Pustejovsky
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cathy Dooley
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Cathy McCoy
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Suzie Bartels
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.