Teams

JBTC - De Angelis

2025 Duval Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

19 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-15vs Beachwalk - RuizLost 12
L#1 DoublesFrank de Angelis / Sarah Davidson vs Kirt Vovou / Allison Roberts6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristine de Angelis / Scott Larochelle vs Gilbert Ruiz / Karen Vovou2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Hayes / Ronald Salateo vs David Mullins / Kimberly Mullins6-4, 7-6
2025-08-01vs Williams Y - RigbyLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristine de Angelis / Thomas Fogwell vs Oksana Andersen / Vasanthan Sakthivel3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Ivers / Nolan Bomar vs Christina Rigby / Garrett Rigby7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNicholas de Angelis / Katherine Sanborn vs Tracy Hodges / Craig Parrish1-6, 2-6
2025-07-25vs Shearwater - BenderWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Young / Margaret Ivers vs Thomas Stephen / Subashini Thomas6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRonald Salateo / Donna Hayes vs Mersid Turjacanin / Angela Uva5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlexis Moraitis / Rick Sanborn vs NANCY MBUTHIA / Dean Uva6-0, 6-3
2025-06-18vs Rivertown - LennoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Lada / George Hansen vs Jillian Copeland / Aleem Wince6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Davidson / Ronald Salateo vs Natalie Winter / Joe Cline6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIrene Perazzo / Jim Young vs Sandra Salley / Murilo Mello6-3, 6-3
2025-06-06vs Julington Creek - FoxWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Lada / Thomas Fogwell vs Kristy Kastleman / Douglas Kastleman6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesIrene Perazzo / Jim Young vs Charumathi Alagesan / Sathish Subramanian6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlexis Moraitis / George Hansen vs Traunia Senior / Lui Senior Iv0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

George Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarah Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Irene Perazzo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Frank de Angelis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Terri Whitson
published
2.57
Donna Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Alexis Moraitis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Lada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Young
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Katherine Sanborn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristine de Angelis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Margaret Ivers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nicholas de Angelis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nolan Bomar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Sanborn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ronald Salateo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Larochelle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Fogwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Vicki Schmechel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank de Angelis + Jennifer Lada213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
George Hansen
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Davidson
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Irene Perazzo
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Frank de Angelis
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Terri Whitson
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Donna Hayes
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.57
Alexis Moraitis
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Lada
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Young
24W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Sanborn
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine de Angelis
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Ivers
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas de Angelis
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nolan Bomar
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rick Sanborn
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Salateo
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Larochelle
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Fogwell
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Schmechel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.