Teams

Lineberger 3.5M Fall Singles Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.5 Men Fall Singles Thurs PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Tan Ren6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMatthew Dunning vs Ian Myers6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesWilliam Lipp vs Kevin Herndon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Andrew Supple6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMatthew Dunning vs Amos Quick6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesWilliam Lipp vs Paul Steimle6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMatthew Dunning vs Alec Kiser6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Mike Harris6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesWilliam Lipp vs Tan Ren0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Bryan Bly1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMark Lineberger vs Phillip Yeary6-0, 6-3
L#3 SinglesWilliam Lipp vs David Harris3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Chris Hanger7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesWilliam Lipp vs Ryan Hilliard2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-25vs Lara 3.5M Fall Singles Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Rodrigo Lara6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesWilliam Deal vs Chris Sigley5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesWilliam Lipp vs Mark Leng2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Diego Waegeli6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesWilliam Deal vs Robert Lynch3-6, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMark Lineberger vs Felipe Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew Dunning vs Devin White5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Kevin Grubb0-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesWilliam Lipp vs Bryan Bly1-6, 1-6
2025-08-15vs Lara 3.5M Fall Singles Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesMatthew Dunning vs Chris Sigley6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesWilliam Deal vs Rodrigo Lara5-5
W#3 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Mark Leng6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men Fall Singles Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
William Deal
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.51
Matthew Dunning
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.50
Benjamin Rainwater
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.47
Kevin Duhaime
published
3.31
Mark Lineberger
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.15
William Lipp
usually #3 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Lineberger + Matthew Dunning8357% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Deal
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Matthew Dunning
33W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Benjamin Rainwater
29W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Kevin Duhaime
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.47
Mark Lineberger
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
William Lipp
5W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.