Teams

BC-PVTC/CraigSunada(formerlyChoe)

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesDavid Stumfall / Tom Wheeler vs Cody Casale / Pankaj Patel3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTucker Delponti vs Richard Sakai6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Dorta / John Duggan vs Tyler Barnhardt / Taka Shimazu2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPaul Huang vs Brent Abrenica6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLennie Brand / Anthony Choe vs Dmitry Rapoport / CURTIS REIMER6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Matthew Lengkeek
published
3.46
Tucker Delponti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.35
David Stumfall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Thad Malit
published
3.27
Michael Dorta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ashly Wong
published 3.5
JOE TALOSI
published 3.5
3.23
Lennie Brand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Anthony Choe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Boris Gelman
published 3.5
3.09
Steven Kaufman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Paul Huang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Tom Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Jeffrey Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Ho
published
John Duggan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Wilner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nick Lozzi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thad Malit + Michael Dorta314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Lengkeek
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Tucker Delponti
27W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
David Stumfall
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Thad Malit
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Michael Dorta
19W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ashly Wong
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
JOE TALOSI
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lennie Brand
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Anthony Choe
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Boris Gelman
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Steven Kaufman
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.09
Paul Huang
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Tom Wheeler
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Jeffrey Kaufman
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Jason Ho
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Duggan
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Wilner
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Lozzi
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.