Teams

Causing a Racquet

2025 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-06-25vs VAMOSLost 03
L#1 SinglesKelsey Jenkins vs Ashley Bryngelson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHailey Blair / Loren Cross vs Karen May / Heather Smartt2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesREBEKAH CRAMER / Chelsea Hiatt vs Vasey Stephens / Heidi Friend1-6, 5-7
2025-06-23vs Having a BallSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKatie Tunca / Chelsea Hiatt vs Allea Muminovic / Taylor Barton5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelsey Jenkins vs Leah Butler6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLoren Cross / REBEKAH CRAMER vs Kelly Thiel / Jennifer Boyd7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeverly Chaney / Hailey Blair vs Beverly Takeuchi / Colleen Trese4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-18vs Chick KickersLost 02
L#2 DoublesKelsey Jenkins / REBEKAH CRAMER vs Sheri Wippel / Angela Troy1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Chaney / Shelley Lundstedt vs Laura Fletcher / Cheryl Martin2-6, 1-6
2025-06-16vs Nice HitsLost 04
L#1 DoublesLoren Cross / Chelsea Hiatt vs Jennifer Rusk / Carolyn Meador5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKelsey Jenkins vs Shannon Stith5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Chaney / Shelley Lundstedt vs Jill Yost / Erin Retelle2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary-Katherine Ekins / Hailey Blair vs Nikki Whiting / Allison Urbatchka4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-11vs Ball BustersLost 03
L#1 DoublesSydney Lewis / Hailey Blair vs Sheila Hennessey / Michelle Brack1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Lundstedt / Beverly Chaney vs Jacqueline Lawley / Kristina Winterling1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesREBEKAH CRAMER / Loren Cross vs Kellie Shadle / Danielle Krawl1-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs Simply SmashingLost 02
L#2 DoublesREBEKAH CRAMER / Chelsea Hiatt vs Patricia Hoffman / Jody Orr1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesShelley Lundstedt / Michelle Goodson vs Karen Silva / Cynthia Melillo2-6, 1-6
2025-06-04vs Get SmashedWon 21
W#1 SinglesKelsey Jenkins vs Natalie Chatfield6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHailey Blair / Sydney Lewis vs Elise Connor / Michelle Dorn2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBeverly Chaney / Shelley Lundstedt vs Sandi Rubio / Diana Linderman6-3, 6-4
2025-06-02vs Eyes on the ballLost 13
L#1 DoublesLoren Cross / Chelsea Hiatt vs Mandy Bergstrom / Jessika Hulewsky6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKelsey Jenkins vs Jackie Verner6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHailey Blair / Sydney Lewis vs Erin Engles / Amber Untch6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeverly Chaney / Shelley Lundstedt vs Trevi Hardy / Vita Mobley1-6, 5-7
2025-05-21vs VAMOSLost 03
L#1 SinglesKelsey Jenkins vs Liz Given2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeverly Chaney / Shelley Lundstedt vs Heidi Friend / Katherine Bruno0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHailey Blair / REBEKAH CRAMER vs Vasey Stephens / Heather Smartt0-6, 1-6
2025-05-19vs Having a BallLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary-Katherine Ekins / Beverly Chaney vs Jennifer Boyd / Kelly Thiel3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesREBEKAH CRAMER / Sydney Lewis vs Tundra McDougal / Leah Butler2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1VAMOS10044621280
2Chick Kickers82292146369
3Nice Hits73282250432
4Eyes on the ball28183268481
5Having a Ball28153578530
6Causing a Racquet19143675511

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Jennifer Jensen
published
2.62
2.56
Katie Tunca
published 3
2.55
Loren Cross
published 3
2.33
Beverly Chaney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.29
Chelsea Hiatt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Hailey Blair
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Kelsey Jenkins
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Mary-Katherine Ekins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Goodson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
REBEKAH CRAMER
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Rachel Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Chaney + Shelley Lundstedt21031% games+0.4% vs expected
Katie Tunca + Loren Cross3738% games−10.2% vs expected
Hailey Blair + Loren Cross0834% gamesnot enough data
Loren Cross + REBEKAH CRAMER044 matchesnot enough data
Loren Cross + Chelsea Hiatt044 matchesnot enough data
REBEKAH CRAMER + Chelsea Hiatt044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Jensen
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Shelley Lundstedt
8W–25L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Katie Tunca
50W–106L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Loren Cross
34W–85L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Beverly Chaney
20W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
3
Chelsea Hiatt
2W–13L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.29
Hailey Blair
2W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelsey Jenkins
20W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary-Katherine Ekins
27W–44L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Goodson
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
REBEKAH CRAMER
4W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Wilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.