Teams

VC BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs WP BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesMeghan Baker / Amy McDevitt vs Tina Braesch / Amy Lloyd4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Needler-Turner vs Jane Reimer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Heather Lichtenfels vs Sally Gibson / Erin Wheeler6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Stephanie McCoy vs Nancy Botiller / Suzanne Booth7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-07-13vs SKY REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesMeghan Baker / Amy McDevitt vs Jocelyn Murphy / Amy Crockett7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStephanie Chichester vs Sara Visser6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Lichtenfels / Jane Toll vs Jennifer Pearson / Paula Daukas2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Anna Steele vs Jennifer Clanahan / Erin Mann6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-07-12vs WP SILVERLost 13
L#1 DoublesMeghan Baker / Stephanie McCoy vs Brooke Webb / Stephanie Baur1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Chichester vs Katie Portenga3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Jane Toll vs Mary Albyn / Kim Schurman6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Lichtenfels / Kate Patton vs Valerie Kilzer / Kara Gwinn2-6, 2-6
2021-07-06vs GCC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Baker / Amy McDevitt vs Meredith Michalski / Jennifer Lloyd6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLindsay Needler-Turner / Jane Toll vs Jocelyn Goodwin / Lori Marks-Connors6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnna Steele / Heather Lichtenfels vs Elena Greeley / Siobhan Zane2-6, 2-6
2021-06-22vs CACM BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesStephanie McCoy / Lindsay Needler-Turner vs Izabela Rydel / Elizabeth Anderman6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesStephanie Chichester vs Britt Nielsen3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Anna Steele vs Eden Parker / Michelle Curtiss0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Lichtenfels / Kate Patton vs Maria Orton / Suzann Gobis0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-15vs EM BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesStephanie Jensen / Amy McDevitt vs Erica Roybal / Jean Steimel3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Chichester vs Becca Mahoney0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Anna Steele vs Sherry Fitzpatrick / Kari Hale6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Kate Patton vs Jill Wichlens / Amy Dodge4-6, 3-6
2021-06-08vs CHCC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesMeghan Baker / Amy McDevitt vs Kelly Stava / Lori Kraatz6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesStephanie Jensen vs Angela Lercara6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane Toll / Lindsay Needler-Turner vs Holly Garnsey / Bevin Wallace6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie McCoy / Merrell Aspin vs Kendra Abbott / Stacey Moreno6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lindsay Needler-Turner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Meghan Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Amy McDevitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Stephanie McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Anna Steele
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Merrell Aspin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Kate Patton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Stephanie Chichester
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.29
Nancy Fridstein
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Heather Lichtenfels
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Jane Toll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Jensen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Toll + Lindsay Needler-Turner8070% games+17.2% vs expected
Stephanie Chichester + Nancy Fridstein3451% games+9.7% vs expected
Meghan Baker + Amy McDevitt301655% games+6.1% vs expected
Lindsay Needler-Turner + Amy McDevitt4157% games+5.9% vs expected
Stephanie McCoy + Lindsay Needler-Turner16855% games+3.1% vs expected
Merrell Aspin + Kate Patton2539% games+0.8% vs expected
Stephanie McCoy + Merrell Aspin5648% games−0.3% vs expected
Anna Steele + Nancy Fridstein1740% games−7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lindsay Needler-Turner
104W–51L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Meghan Baker
136W–75L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Amy McDevitt
45W–33L career · 5 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.97
Stephanie McCoy
41W–53L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Anna Steele
26W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Merrell Aspin
78W–94L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Kate Patton
72W–120L career · 3 lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
2.43
Stephanie Chichester
35W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%85%15%
2.37
Nancy Fridstein
47W–77L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Heather Lichtenfels
13W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jane Toll
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Jensen
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.