Teams

MZvara (Queens)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-02vs ADonathan (Life Time)Split 22
L#1 DoublesAnnie Spence / Julie Lowe vs Kacey Kopley / Leezah Pratt2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMallory Zvara vs Kristy Simmons6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennie Corbett / Amanda Kuhn vs Lea Powell / Stacey Reinhardt6-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKristy Boyles vs Nichole Hyland6-1, 6-1
2025-03-14vs MBell (Charlotte CC)Split 22
W#1 DoublesAmanda Frank / Leigh Young vs Amy Schaaf / Rachel Lee6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMallory Zvara vs Amy Moore6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTaylor Russ / Margo Cash vs Mandi Bell / Jordan Collier6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristina Burgess / Jennie Corbett vs Cathy Austin / Tracey Cook4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Mallory Zvara
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.51
Kristy Boyles
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Leigh Rogers
published
3.36
Kathy Gilchrist
published
3.26
Jennie Corbett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Taylor Russ
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amanda Kuhn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Annie Spence
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Christina Burgess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Leigh Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Margo Cash
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Mac Lawrence
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Gilchrist + Kristy Boyles224 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Rogers + Mallory Zvara213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory Zvara
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Kristy Boyles
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Leigh Rogers
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Kathy Gilchrist
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Jennie Corbett
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.26
Taylor Russ
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Amanda Kuhn
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Annie Spence
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Christina Burgess
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leigh Young
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Margo Cash
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Mac Lawrence
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.