Teams

Pennington 2.5

2025 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 2.5 Men 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-01vs Robbins 2.5 SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichael Gansmann vs Tim Costikyan6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJames Nester vs Keith Henderson6-1, 6-0
2025-02-22vs Robbins 2.5 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesGregory Loehr vs Chris Geatz6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRand Pennington vs Jarrod Artim6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJames Nester vs Keith Henderson6-0, 6-0
2025-02-15vs Robbins 2.5 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesGregory Loehr vs Daniel Adams6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRand Pennington vs Gabriel Cuevas Vivas6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesKyle Hendren vs Tim Costikyan6-2, 6-4
2025-02-10vs Robbins 2.5 SinglesWon 21
L#1 SinglesKyle Hendren vs Gabriel Cuevas Vivas6-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesBrian Bursell vs Chris Geatz6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesGregory Loehr vs Jarrod Artim6-1, 6-1
2025-02-05vs Robbins 2.5 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesGregory Loehr vs Gabriel Cuevas Vivas6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKevin Rice vs Jeffrey Robbins6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesRand Pennington vs Tim Costikyan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-01vs Robbins 2.5 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesBrian Bursell vs Jeffrey Robbins6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRand Pennington vs Chris Geatz6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMichael Gansmann vs Tim Costikyan6-1, 6-0
2025-01-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesGregory Loehr vs Daniel Adams6-0, 6-1
2025-01-22vs Robbins 2.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesKyle Hendren vs Chris Geatz6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRand Pennington vs Daniel Adams1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJames Nester vs Keith Henderson6-0, 6-0
2025-01-15vs Robbins 2.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesGregory Loehr vs Jeffrey Robbins6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKevin Rice vs Daniel Adams4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Gansmann vs Keith Henderson6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Bursell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.68
Gregory Loehr
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published
2.54
James Nester
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.49
Kevin Rice
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.46
Michael Gansmann
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.36
Rand Pennington
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Kyle Hendren
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brian Bursell
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gregory Loehr
19W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
James Nester
16W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Kevin Rice
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Michael Gansmann
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Rand Pennington
21W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36
Kyle Hendren
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.