Teams

BTA-F YELLOW

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-27vs TTA GREENSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRon Phillips vs Thi Than6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesEduardo Martinez Escalante / Scott Hemphill vs Caleb Fahrner / Eric Wittkowske2-6, 2-6
2025-08-26vs BCC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesScott Hemphill / Eduardo Martinez Escalante vs William Kramer / Brian Waters1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRodrigo Garcia vs Matthew Klein6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRon Phillips / Kevin Davis vs Justin Astley / Andrew Morley6-4, 6-2
2025-08-13vs NJ GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Pierce / Scott Hemphill vs Garrett Sailer / Andrew James1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRodrigo Garcia vs Ron Funderburke6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Davis / Eduardo Martinez Escalante vs Jeremy Hand / Lawrence McGaughy1-6, 3-6
2025-08-06vs LTA-Q REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesEduardo Martinez Escalante / Michael Pierce vs John Reenan / Jim Piccolini0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRodrigo Garcia vs Luke Trautwein6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKevin Davis / Ron Phillips vs Bret Simon / Brad Haigis7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-05vs CVTA TEALWon 20
W#1 SinglesRodrigo Garcia vs Tim Graves6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEduardo Martinez Escalante / Michael Pierce vs Michael Menassa / Simon Menassa7-5, 6-3
2025-07-23vs RCC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Hemphill / Ryan Coleman vs Travis LaBerge / Copland LaBerge6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRodrigo Garcia vs Philip Wang7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Pierce / Eduardo Martinez Escalante vs Cecil Sunder / Bryan Cobb5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Ryan Wellman
published
3.85
Ron Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.65
Rodrigo Garcia
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.61
Eduardo Martinez Escalante
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Scott Hemphill
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Pierce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Pierce + Eduardo Martinez Escalante134 matchesnot enough data
Scott Hemphill + Eduardo Martinez Escalante044 matchesnot enough data
Rodrigo Garcia + Ryan Wellman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Wellman
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Ron Phillips
20W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Rodrigo Garcia
11W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Eduardo Martinez Escalante
60W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Scott Hemphill
9W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Michael Pierce
9W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.