Teams

SD 2.5 Barnes TC/ Rivera (3)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesMirna Rivera / Sahara C Vazquez M vs Alisa Dunn / Jill Russell6-3, 6-3
2022-05-27vs SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ Bergland (3)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMirna Rivera / Joan Elgincolin vs Janet Bergland / Anja Dixson1-6, 2-6
2022-05-20vs SD 2.5 Montevalle Rec/ Limon (2:1)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Robb / Guadalupe Acosta vs Edith Limon / Rosemarie De Silva5-7, 6-7
2022-05-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoan Elgincolin / Mirna Rivera vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-22vs SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ Bergland (3)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMirna Rivera / Rebecca Robb vs Peggy Bentley / Susan Welker6-1, 6-4
2022-04-15vs SD 2.5 Montevalle Rec/ Limon (2:1)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMirna Rivera / Joan Elgincolin vs Cinthia Borbon / Cinthya Villarreal6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNuri Velasco Andrade / Guadalupe Acosta vs Brenda Henriquez / Rosemarie De Silva4-6, 2-6
2022-04-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesGuadalupe Acosta vs EMIKO SHOJIMA1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Denisse Fax
published 3.5
3.06
Mirna Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Guadalupe Acosta
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
2.68
Rebecca Robb
published
2.62
Sahara C Vazquez M
published
2.56
KARLA FLORES
published
2.45
Monica Perez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Robb + KARLA FLORES224 matchesnot enough data
Denisse Fax + Guadalupe Acosta314 matchesnot enough data
Guadalupe Acosta + Georgette Moreira213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denisse Fax
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3
Mirna Rivera
68W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Guadalupe Acosta
54W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Georgette Moreira
77W–40L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Rebecca Robb
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Sahara C Vazquez M
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
KARLA FLORES
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Nuri Velasco Andrade
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.45
Monica Perez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.