Teams

Aton

2021 18&Over Women · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-19vs Pannu/SmartLost 04
L#1 DoublesYoungHui Amend / Emily Panigrosso vs Janet Garbarini / Lorraine Bates4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJenae Norris / Judith Mangiacapra vs Danielle Loeb / Pamela Smart0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesGina Callahan vs Katie Ellsworth6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngel Aton / Anna Addonisio vs Amy Paulsen / Shamsher Dhillon2-6, 0-6
2021-07-06vs Western: BurnsLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Beach / Tara Kaminsky vs Sue Burns / Jennifer Small2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Saroka vs Dawn Worden1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Burnard / Roberta Bergin vs Amanda Spottek / Kim Yuhnick1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Strattan vs Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege0-6, 5-7
2021-06-29vs Pannu/SmartLost 05
L#1 DoublesRoberta Bergin / Carol Burnard vs Lorraine Bates / Diane Campbell2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Panigrosso vs Katie Ellsworth2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAngel Aton / Ann Saroka vs Prab Pannu / Christine Coveney1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesYoungHui Amend vs Pamela Smart1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Mangiacapra / Jenae Norris vs Amy Paulsen / Shamsher Dhillon1-6, 2-6
2021-06-22vs Western: BurnsLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Beach / Vicki Monticello vs Dawn Worden / Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Saroka vs Amanda Spottek3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Mangiacapra / Jenae Norris vs Sue Burns / Jennifer Small2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Strattan / Gina Callahan vs Sandy Batrowny / Brenda Myers0-6, 4-6
2021-06-14vs Western: BurnsLost 04
L#1 DoublesStephanie Blodgett / YoungHui Amend vs Sue Burns / Karyn Kilmartin2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Addonisio vs Dawn Worden0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Monticello / Anna Strattan vs Erica Haray / Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTara Kaminsky / Gina Callahan vs Kim Yuhnick / Jennifer Small0-6, 1-6
2021-06-07vs Pannu/SmartLost 13
L#1 SinglesEmily Panigrosso vs Pamela Smart0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Saroka / Carol Burnard vs Wendy Cubic / Danielle Loeb6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesYoungHui Amend vs Katie Ellsworth2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Addonisio / Anna Strattan vs Rekha Patel / Diane Campbell0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Burns602739136
2Pannu/Smart33161430234
3Aton0622858361

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Saroka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Tara Kaminsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Carol Burnard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Anna Strattan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Emily Panigrosso
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Gina Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.46
Anna Addonisio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.39
Jenae Norris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Angel Aton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Judith Mangiacapra
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Beach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Martino
published
YoungHui Amend
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenae Norris + Rebecca Martino2348% games+1.3% vs expected
Lisa Beach + Carol Burnard3240% games+0.2% vs expected
Angel Aton + Tara Kaminsky2440% games−1.2% vs expected
Tara Kaminsky + Gina Callahan51042% games−3.9% vs expected
YoungHui Amend + Emily Panigrosso134 matchesnot enough data
Judith Mangiacapra + Jenae Norris044 matchesnot enough data
Angel Aton + Gina Callahan134 matchesnot enough data
Anna Addonisio + Carol Burnard134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Saroka
35W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tara Kaminsky
40W–42L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Carol Burnard
8W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anna Strattan
18W–27L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Emily Panigrosso
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Gina Callahan
27W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
2.59
3
Anna Addonisio
8W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
2.46
Jenae Norris
6W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
2.39
2.5
Angel Aton
7W–30L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Judith Mangiacapra
8W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Beach
8W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Martino
19W–29L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
YoungHui Amend
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.