Teams

FCCC WHITE

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-18vs CSU GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJane Schmelzle / Jennifer Camp vs Brittney Stephenson / Laura Powers6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBetsy Markey vs Paige Kanatous6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristie Steinbock / Kelly Day vs Debora J Miller / Monica Bice3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Karen DeLine vs Erin Dirvonas / Kristen Frisch7-5, 6-3
2024-07-11vs TAG PINKSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBetsy Markey / Jane Schmelzle vs Lisa Novacek / Amber Slade5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesLisa Olsen vs Nikki Ellis6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Jennifer Camp vs Larea Warden / Janet Crespin3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren DeLine / Jane Gronewoller vs Michelle Sheets / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik6-3, 7-5
2024-07-02vs HMTC SILVERSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Camp / Lisa Olsen vs Cimarron Spitz / Sharon Sturges3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJane Schmelzle vs Gina Zachman6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Betsy Markey vs Wendy Ball / Sara Heskin6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJane Gronewoller / Kristie Steinbock vs Ginger Victor / Maria Ellis6-7, 3-6
2024-06-27vs LVTA ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesJane Schmelzle / Karen Dunbar vs Heather Huntley / Heidi Abrahamson6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Olsen vs Josephine Bikos6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Clay / Kelly Day vs Connie Erickson / Karen Pielin4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Gronewoller / Kristie Steinbock vs Hilary Gaylord / Melissa King4-6, 4-6
2024-06-20vs FCCC PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesJane Schmelzle / Jane Gronewoller vs KARA JONES / Robyn Brady6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBetsy Markey vs Holly K. Brown0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Karen DeLine vs Michelle Clark / Jody Wood6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Clay / Kelly Day vs Melissa Conlon / Tara Leman6-1, 6-2
2024-06-13vs CSU GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Betsy Markey vs Brittney Stephenson / Alana Tutt0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJane Schmelzle vs Paige Kanatous7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Gronewoller / Kelly Day vs Falguni Gill / Laura Powers3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJenny McCulloch / Lisa Olsen vs Tracy Hutton / Erin Dirvonas5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-06vs TAG PINKLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren DeLine / Kelly Day vs Michelle Sheets / Annette Nueske7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Olsen vs Wendy Saltz5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJenny McCulloch / Jane Gronewoller vs Joyce Hirano-Kuznik / Amber Slade1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jane Schmelzle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Jennifer Camp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Lisa Olsen
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Betsy Markey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Jane Gronewoller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Kelly Day
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
Lisa Clay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Kristie Steinbock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jenny McCulloch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen DeLine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kristine Clagett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Gronewoller + Kristine Clagett6070% games+9.7% vs expected
Jennifer Camp + Kelly Day2348% games+4.0% vs expected
Jane Gronewoller + Lisa Clay3644% games−0.5% vs expected
Jennifer Camp + Jane Gronewoller1540% games−3.6% vs expected
Jennifer Camp + Lisa Clay1541% games−6.5% vs expected
Lisa Clay + Kelly Day3545% games−7.3% vs expected
Jane Gronewoller + Kelly Day31038% games−7.5% vs expected
Kristie Steinbock + Kelly Day0633% games−11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jane Schmelzle
68W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
Jennifer Camp
17W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Lisa Olsen
51W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Betsy Markey
21W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jane Gronewoller
72W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Kelly Day
22W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
Lisa Clay
16W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Kristie Steinbock
19W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Jenny McCulloch
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen DeLine
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine Clagett
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.