Teams

Grande

2025 Loudoun Doubles Fall Women · Loudoun Doubles Fall 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-18vs Marcotte - Fall FireballsWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacy Mowry / Kelly Rowley vs Elizabeth Law / Nicole Rosser6-4, 6-3
2025-11-11vs RC-Schaefer/DavisWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaula Garrison / Tonya Turner vs Kimberly Murray / Coni Schaefer6-7, 3-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Norman / Carolyn Mccarter vs Christine Feit / Jen Kaine6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTamara Clarke / Peggah Wilson vs Annie Baba / Jeannie Matteson7-5, 6-3
2025-11-06vs Campbell/ WilliamsWon 20
W#2 DoublesTonya Turner / Peggah Wilson vs Emily Allen / Sue Wagner6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichelle Grande / Paula Garrison vs Katrine Pendleton / Judy Rector6-3, 6-2
2025-10-31vs NittaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatherine Deming / Carolyn Mccarter vs Lisa Kottmann / Julianne Nitta4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Norman / Stacy Mowry vs Ami Gordon / Alexandra Robinson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-14vs CRUSHing Pumpkins- Furgal/FriedmanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJamie Davis / Stacy Mowry vs Kathleen McFarlane / Anne Marie Randolph6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarol Oltjen / Stephanie Yarmosh vs Hannah Auyang / Lauren Malone0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-09vs Nilsson - Dynamic DuosLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Grande / Carolyn Mccarter vs Jennifer Yoon / Kendra McQuillan4-6, 1-6
2025-10-02vs Direnzo - Mood SwingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJamie Davis / Carolyn Mccarter vs Kate Putt / Kerry Smith7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly Rowley / Stephanie Yarmosh vs Elizabeth Pyszka / Stacie Kotter2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesPaula Garrison / Michelle Grande vs Sharon DiRenzo / Jennifer Leibold6-3, 6-2
2025-09-26vs McMullen - Double TroubleWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Cooke / Paula Garrison vs Mindi Moshides / Suzanne McMullen6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Mccarter / Stephanie Yarmosh vs Nicole Leppert / Tricia Hodnett6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKelly Rowley / Rebecca Norman vs Lisa Phaneuf / Stephanie Frauen5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Doubles Fall 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Stacy Mowry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Jamie Davis
published
3.33
Carolyn Mccarter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Kelly Rowley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Tonya Turner
published
3.27
Stephanie Yarmosh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Paula Garrison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Susan Cooke
published
3.15
Michelle Grande
published
3.15
Peggah Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.14
Tamara Clarke
published
3.02
Carol Oltjen
published 3.5
2.98
Rebecca Norman
published
2.95
Tamara Dunlap
published
2.86
Ashley Whitner
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Dunlap + Ashley Whitner7162% games+19.9% vs expected
Kelly Rowley + Stacy Mowry9062% games+10.8% vs expected
Kelly Rowley + Carolyn Mccarter4260% games+10.6% vs expected
Kelly Rowley + Stephanie Yarmosh314 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Mccarter + Stephanie Yarmosh404 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Rowley + Rebecca Norman213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Grande + Paula Garrison213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Grande + Stephanie Yarmosh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacy Mowry
86W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
Jamie Davis
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Mccarter
89W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Kelly Rowley
65W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Tonya Turner
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Stephanie Yarmosh
62W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Paula Garrison
115W–102L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Susan Cooke
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Michelle Grande
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Peggah Wilson
148W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Tamara Clarke
56W–80L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Carol Oltjen
28W–58L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Rebecca Norman
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Tamara Dunlap
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Ashley Whitner
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.